Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (1.25 MB, 254 trang )
3/ 3 6
BUY-SELL AGREEMENT HANDBOOK
counting the buyout price according to possible
impairment of your company’s reputation. For instance, your agreement can allow the company or
the remaining owners to purchase the share of an
expelled owner at 50% of the full Agreement
Price to allow for the possibility that the coowner’s conduct has resulted in the business’s doing poorly. Or, you may simply want to provide
for a new appraisal of the company to establish
its current worth. (We discuss the procedure for
getting an appraisal in Chapter 6.)
Expulsion may be one area where you do not
want to allow binding arbitration. Arbitration
is a method of settling a conflict where a neutral
third party makes a decision rather than a judge
(discussed in Chapter 8). For many people, it’s
usually a better choice than going to court, but in
this situation, an arbitrator might decide you can’t
expel a partner or other co-owner when you
think it is absolutely necessary for your business’s
survival. So you may not want required arbitration
to apply to expulsion. To accomplish this, at the
end of your expulsion clause, add a declaration
that any expulsion decision is absolutely final and
is not subject to arbitration or other review, including review by any court. (This will make the
arbitration clause not apply, since the arbitration
clause in our agreement starts with the phrase,
“Except as otherwise provided in this agreement.”)
The expulsion clause included in our buy-sell
agreement is shown in Excerpt 13.
Worksheet. If you are interested in giving
the company and the continuing owners
the option to buy an expelled owner’s interest,
check Option 1 on your worksheet now. (Section
III, Scenario 8.)
If you check Option 1, you can choose to define adequate cause. If you choose to do so, you
may check one or all of the following:
• check Option 1a to include criminal conduct
as an instance of adequate cause
• check Option 1b to include breach of duties
as an instance of adequate cause
• check Option 1c to list your own reasons
for expulsion for adequate cause.
If you do not check any of these options, adequate cause will be determined at the time of
expulsion.
If you checked Option 1a, 1b or 1c, you must
choose the price to be paid for the expelled
owner’s interest:
• check Option 1d to use the regular Agreement Price, or
• check Option 1e to call for an appraisal of
the expelled owner’s ownership interest, or
• check Option 1f to use a discounted Agreement Price. If you check Option 1c, also fill
in the percentage amount of the discount to
be taken off the Agreement Price, such as
50%.
This provision applies only to businesses with
more than two owners. If you own your
business with one other person, you will not be
able to expel that person. So if your co-owner is
acting badly or not working up to par, unless you
convince her to sell out, your only other option
might be to disband the company.
PROVIDING THE RIGHT TO FORCE BUYOUTS
3/37
Scenario 8. Expulsion of Owner
Option 1: Option of Company and Continuing Owners to Purchase an Expelled
Owner’s Interest
(a) At a time when the company has three or more owners, situations may arise in which a
group of owners wish to expel another owner. An owner may be expelled upon a
unanimous vote of all other owners for adequate cause. Upon such expulsion, the
expelled owner is deemed to have offered to sell all of his or her interest to the company
and the continuing owners. The company and the continuing owners shall then have an
option, but not an obligation (unless otherwise stated in this agreement), to purchase all
or part of the ownership interest within the time and according to the procedure in
Section IV, Provision 1 of this agreement. The price to be paid shall be as specified in this
section; if not so specified, then according to Section VI of this agreement. The manner of
payments and other terms of the purchase shall be according to Section VII of this
agreement. An owner who has been expelled is referred to as an “expelled owner”
below.
(b) Adequate cause includes, but is not limited to:
Option 1a: Any criminal conduct against the company (such as embezzlement)
Option 1b: A serious breach of the owner’s duties or of any written policy of the
company
[insert reasons]
Option 1c:
(c) If an owner is expelled for a reason listed in subsection (b), the price that the company
and/or the continuing owners will pay for the expelled owner’s ownership interest will
be:
Option 1d: The full Agreement Price according to Section VI of this agreement
Option 1e: Decided by an independent appraisal, according to the Appraised Value
Method in Section VI of this agreement
Option 1f: The Agreement Price as established in Section VI of this agreement,
decreased by [insert percentage, such as “50”] %
Excerpt 13
■
CHAPTER
4
Structuring Buyouts
A. Types of Buyout Procedures ............................................................................. 4/2
1. Entity-Purchase Buyback (Called a Redemption Buyback for Corporations) ... 4/2
2. Cross-Purchase Buyback .............................................................................. 4/4
3. Combination of Entity-Purchase and Cross-Purchase Buyback .................... 4/4
B. How Our “Wait and See” Approach Works ...................................................... 4/5
1. How Our Buyback Procedure Works With an Option to Purchase .............. 4/5
2. How Our Buyback Procedure Works With a Right of First Refusal ............ 4/11
3. How Our Buyout Procedure Works With a Right to Force a Sale .............. 4/11
4/ 2
BUY-SELL AGREEMENT HANDBOOK
I
n Chapters 2 and 3, we discussed how you
can use buy-sell provisions—including the
Right of First Refusal, the Option to Purchase
an Owner’s Interest and the Right to Force a
Sale—to control who owns your company and to
give departing owners a mechanism to cash out.
If you include any of these provisions in your
buy-sell agreement, at some point during your
company’s life, the company or the continuing
owners will probably purchase a departing
owner’s interest. To ensure that all buyout
situations are handled smoothly, your buy-sell
agreement provides how a future buyout will be
carried out.
Our agreement’s buyout procedure includes
the following details:
• how and when the company and the
continuing owners decide who will buy the
ownership interest of the selling, departing
or deceased owner (we’ll call that owner the
“transferring” owner, and the ownership interest the “available interest”). In other
words, our agreement provides a framework
for deciding whether the company itself or
the owners who will remain in the company
(we’ll call them the “continuing owners”)
will buy the available interest.
• how and when the company and continuing
owners must notify the transferring owner
that they will purchase his or her interest
(using a Notice of Intent to Purchase an
Owner’s Interest).
We show you how our buy-sell agreement
handles these items below. The only choices
you’ll have to make in this chapter involve the
number of days for decisions, notices and the
like.
A. Types of Buyout Procedures
There are three main approaches to implementing
a buyout. The main difference among these methods involves who will buy the transferring
owner’s interest—the company or the continuing
owners, or a combination of the two.
We present these three common methods of
buying back interests below. (Our agreement uses
the third method, for the reasons explained below.)
1. Entity-Purchase Buyback
(Called a Redemption Buyback
for Corporations)
In this first type of buyback procedure, called an
“entity-purchase buyback,” when an owner
retires, dies or wants to sell out, only the company (the “entity”) has the option, or sometimes
the obligation—depending on what clauses are
included in the buy-sell agreement—to buy the
transferring owner’s interest in the company.
What happens after the company buys the
available interest depends on how your business
is organized. In a corporation, the company simply
cancels the redeemed shares after a buyback, and
the continuing shareholders’ ownership percentages in the company increase accordingly (though
the amount of shares they own will not change).
Similarly, in a partnership or an LLC, after the
company buys an owner’s interest, the interest is
“liquidated,” and the continuing partners’ or
members’ ownership percentages increase.
The entity-purchase method is popular because
it allows company funds rather than personal
funds or personal loans to complete a buyout. But
the main advantage of this method is its simplicity.
By deciding who will buy the transferring owner’s
interest far in advance of the actual buyback, this
method eliminates the need to decide who will
make the buyback at the time of the buyout.
However, because this method is so simple, it
lacks flexibility. For example, it doesn’t give one
or more continuing owners the option of buying
the ownership interest themselves, an approach
that can sometimes result in significant income
and capital gains tax advantages to both the continuing owners and the transferring owner. In
short, since rapidly changing tax laws as well as
constant changes in companies’ and owners’ situations make it impossible to know years in ad-
STRUCTURING BUYOUTS
vance whether it would be best have the company or the continuing owners buy the interest in
question, a more informed decision can be made
at the time of the buyout.
We discuss the income tax disadvantages
of company-sponsored buyouts briefly in
Chapter 9, Section A. Note, however, that this is a
complicated area, and you will no doubt want to
get a tax expert’s opinion before having your
company or the continuing owners buy out an
owner’s interest.
Corporations and LLCs can’t always buy out
a departing owner. In most states, corpora-
tions and LLCs cannot absolutely bind themselves
to a plan to buy back the interest of a departing
owner. That’s because, to legally do this, the
company is required to be in good financial
shape—in other words, to have sufficient surplus
funds available before purchasing a transferring
owner’s interest. (See “Your Company Should Remain Solvent After a Buyback,” just below.)
4/3
Your Company Should Remain
Solvent After a Buyback
As a rule, state corporation and LLC laws prevent a corporation or LLC from buying back an
owner’s interest if specific financial solvency
tests cannot be met. Generally, state law
requires that, after the buyback, the company’s
assets must exceed its liabilities (sometimes by
a specified amount). For example, a state may
say that a company’s assets must be at least one
and one-half times its liabilities after the
buyback. And, almost as a universal rule, to
participate in a buyback the corporation or LLC
must be able to pay its debts as they become
due after the buyback (that is, the company
must remain solvent after the purchase of the
owner’s interest). Rather than worry too much
about these restrictions now, just realize that in
the future, if your corporation or LLC would
have to use most or all of its cash reserves to
buy back a departing owner’s shares, it may be
illegal to go forward with the deal. But this
doesn’t mean there would be a legal impediment to one or more co-owners’ individually
buying back shares. Which, of course, is another way of saying that it’s important to have a
buy-sell agreement procedure that lets you decide at the time of the buyout who should buy
the shares of a transferring owner.
Partnerships should follow this solvency
test, too. While not normally required
under state partnership laws, it also makes
sense for partnerships to make sure that they
remain solvent after a company buyback of a
partner’s interest. Even if your partnership
agreement and state law allow your company
to pay more than it can afford to buy back an
owner’s interest, it would be foolhardy for it to
do so.