Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (47.98 MB, 954 trang )
438 Plastics Bused on Styrene
Very many copolymers with styrene as the principal constituent have been
prepared and a number have been marketed. In some instances there is an
appreciable increase in toughness but usually in such cases the softening point of
the copolymer is much lower than that of the homopolymer. For example
copolymers from 70 parts of styrene and 30 parts butadiene, although tough, are
leather-like. Such materials have in the past been used primarily as stiffening
resins in rubber compounds, it generally being considered that if sufficient
butadiene were present in the polymer to raise toughness sufficiently then the
softening point would be unacceptably low. One exception to this rule is the
range of materials first marketed by Phillips as BDS K-resin. These are a special
type of block copolymer dealt with later.
The materials now classified as high-impact polystyrenes, or with increasing
frequency as toughened polystyrenes, are combinations of polystyrene with
rubbery materials. The early grades that were first developed in the 1950s used
hot polymerised SBR (see Chapter 11) but for technical reasons discussed later
SBR has now been largely replaced by solution polymerised polybutadiene
rubber (also see Chapter 11). More recently, there has been interest in the use of
SBS triblock thermoplastic rubbers for this purpose. Because of the presence of
main chain double bonds both rubbers are subject to oxidation, with the
consequence that high-impact polystyrene polymers prepared using such diene
rubbers become brittle on prolonged exposure to sunlight. Materials showing
improved weathering resistance have been developed in Japan using EPDM
rubbers and similar materials have now been developed elsewhere.
The polystyrene and the rubber may be blended in a number of ways.
Originally the ingredients were compounded in a two-roll mill, in an internal
mixer or in an extruder. The impact strength of the products was, however, little
better than the unmodified polymer. Blending of SBR latex and polystyrene
latex, which is then followed by co-coagulation and drying, has also been
employed in the past but once again the improvement is only marginal.
Today the common practice is first to dissolve the rubber in the styrene
monomer and then to polymerise the styrene in the usual way. By this process the
resultant blend will contain not only rubber and polystyrene but also a graft
polymer where short styrene side chains have been attached to the rubber
molecules. This gives a marked improvement in the impact strengths that can be
obtained.
It has been demonstrated that with SBR polystyrene blends the rubber
should exist in discrete droplets, less than 5 0 p m in diameter where a good
finish is required, within the polystyrene matrix. It is believed that in such a
form the rubber can reduce crack propagation and hence fracture in various
ways." The most favoured current explanations of this were discussed in
Chapter 3. Suffice it to say here that the following features appear necessary
for a suitable blend:
(1) The rubber and the polystyrene should not be compatible. If they are there
will be molecular mixing and no improvement in toughness.
( 2 ) The rubber should not be too incompatible if good rubber-polystyrene
adhesion is to be obtained.
In effect this means that, to achieve reasonable toughness, semicompatible
rubbers should be used. Semicompatibility may be achieved (a) by selecting
mixtures of slightly different solubility parameter from the polystyrene, (b) by
High-impact Polystyrenes (HIPS) (Toughened Polystyrenes (TPS)) 439
judicious amounts of cross-linking or (c) by judicious use of selected graft
polymers. In current commercial grades it is probable that all three features are
involved.
In commerical SBR-based polymers there are three main variables to be
considered:
(1) The amount of SBR added, usually 5-20% (see Figure 16.12).An increase
in the SBR will increase the toughness but there will be an attendant
reduction in softening point.
( 2 ) The size of the rubber particles. In a typical blend these would be in the range
1-10 pm. Grades containing large particles (and which contain up to 10%
acrylonitrile residues in the matrix polymer) are used where good stress
cracking resistance is required. Small particles are used where high gloss,
toughness and stiffness are priority requirements.
(3) The gel content (toluene insoluble per cent) of the rubber and the swelling
index of the gel (the ratio of the volume of a swollen gel to its unswollen
volume). The former is a measure of the amount of cross-linked material and
the second a measure of the intensity of cross-linking. It has been found"
that a sample of medium gel content (5-20%) and a medium swelling index
(10-20) gives the best impact strength in the blend.
A high-impact polystyrene (polystyrene SBR blend) may have seven times the
impact strength of ordinary polystyrene, but about half the tensile strength, a
lower hardness and a softening point some 15°C lower. Because of the rubber
content there may be a reduction in light and heat stability and stabilisers are
normally incorporated.
The use of stabilisers (antioxidants) may, however, have adverse effects in
that they inhibit cross-linking of the rubber. The influence of phenolic
antioxidants on polystyrene-SBR alloys blended in an internal mixer at 180°C
has been studied. It was found that alloys containing 1% of certain phenolic
antioxidants were gel-deficient in the rubber phase. l2 The gel-deficient blends
were blotchy in appearance, and had lower flow rates compared with the
normal materials, and mouldings were somewhat brittle. Substantial improvements in the impact properties were achieved when the antioxidant was added
later in the mixing cycle after the rubber had reached a moderate degree of
cross-linking.
5
0
SBR CONTENT IN BLEND IN%
Figure 16.12. Effect of adding SBR on the impact strength of polystyrene
440 Plastics Based on Styrene
SBR has now been superseded by high cis-1,4-polybutadine because of the
greater effectiveness of the latter.l 3 , I 4 Reasons given for this greater effectiveness
include a better balance of the compatibility-incompatibility factors, the lower
glass transition temperature of the rubber (-100°C instead of -55°C for SBR),
greater resilience than SBR and the higher reactivity towards grafting. In addition
the polybutadiene is not contaminated with the large amounts of soap associated
with emulsion polymerised SBR and so leads to better gloss and lower moisture
pick-up. For the best results a typical poly-1,4-butadiene would have a high cis
content (for minimum T g ) , low gel (<0.05% for maximum gloss) and low
molecular weight (Mooney Viscosity of approx. 38) to facilitate dissolution and
would be water-white and free of residual traces of catalyst fragments such as
titanium which may cause severe discolouration. High-impact materials with a
degree of transparency have been prepared from 1:2-polybutadiene. In this case
the double bond is present in a pendant vinyl group rather than in the main chain.
It is thus more reactive and unless the grafting process is camed out at
temperatures below 100°C and under carefully controlled conditions excess
cross-linking may occur.
Transparent toughened polystyrene polymers are produced by blending
polystyrene with SBS block copolymers (see Section 11.8). During the 1970s and
1980s most development was with block copolymers with a radial (or star) shape.
Two types were developed: block copolymers with a central butadiene block, and
block copolymers with a central polystyrene block.
More recently Fina Chemicals have introduced linear SBS materials
(Finaclear) in which the butadiene is present both in block form and in a mixed
butadiene-styrene block. Thus comparing typical materials with a total styrene
content of about 75% by weight, the amount of rubbery segment in the total
molecule is somewhat higher. As a result it is claimed that when blended with
polystyrene the linear block copolymers give polymers with a higher impact
strength but without loss of clarity.
Tough transparent sheet may be produced by blending standard polystyrene
with block copolymer in an extruder in the ratios 80:20 to 20:80, depending on
the application of the products subsequently thermoformed from the sheet. For
example, sheet for thermoforming an egg tray will not require the same level of
impact strength as that required for jam jars.
Optical properties of the blends are somewhat dependent on the molecular
weight of the polystyrene, presence of additives such as lubricant in the
polystyrene, ratio of polystyrene to SBS, processing conditions and mixing
effectiveness of the extruder. It is stated that the optical properties of the sheets
are similar whether linear or radial type stereoblock polymers are used.
A number of polyi~oprenes'~
have also been investigated as potential
toughening agents. By careful control of grafting conditions high-impact
blends have been made from 3:4-polyisoprenes, Neither natural rubber
(essentially cis-1,4-polyisoprene) nor the other synthetic polyisoprenes give a
significant reinforcing effect. Ethylene-propylene rubbers which have been
peroxidised by bubbling oxygen through a solution of the polymer whilst
irradiating with ultralviolet light may also toughen polystyrene. The peroxidised rubber is dissolved in styrene monomer in the concentration range of
5 2 0 % and the solution reacted at above 70°C. The peroxide or hydroperoxide groups present then decompose with the formation of free radicals
which initiate growth of a polystyrene branch on the chain of the rubber
molecule.
ABS Plastics 441
16.7 STYRENE-ACRYLONITRILE COPOLYMERS
Styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers (-20-30% acrylonitrile content) have been
commercially available for a number of years. Initially, however, the price of
these materials was too high for them to find more than a few specialised outlets.
Because of the polar nature of the acrylonitrile molecule these copolymers have
better resistance to hydrocarbons, oils and greases than polystyrene. They also
have a higher softening point, a much better resistance to stress cracking and
crazing and an enhanced impact strength and yet retain the transparency of the
homopolymer. The higher the acrylonitrile content the greater the toughness and
chemical resistance but the greater the difficulty in moulding and the greater the
yellowness of the resin. Typical resins have a water absorption about that of
poly(methy1 methacrylate), Le. about ten times that of polystyrene but about onetenth that of cellulose acetate.
Some typical properties of styrene-acrylonitrile plastics, referred to in many
countries as SAN, are compared with those of other styrene-based plastics in
Table 16.7.
The market for SAN has remained small relative to that for polystyrene and
ABS (discussed in the next section) and is probably only about 5% that of the
latter. Major producers are BASF, Dow, Monsanto and Montedison.
The important features of rigidity and transparency make the material
competitive with polystyrene, cellulose acetate and poly(methy1 methacrylate)
for a number of applications. In general the copolymer is cheaper than
poly(methy1 methacrylate) and cellulose acetate, tougher than poly(methy1
methacrylate) and polystyrene and superior in chemical and most physical
properties to polystyrene and cellulose acetate. It does not have such a high
transparency or such food weathering properties as poly(methy1 methacrylate).
As a result of these considerations the styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers have
found applications for dials, knobs and covers for domestic appliances, electrical
equipment and car equipment, for picnicware and housewares, and a number of
other industrial and domestic applications with requirements somewhat more
stringent than can be met by polystyrene.
SAN is also used for pharmaceutical and cosmetic packaging. Usage
breakdown for Western Europe in the early 1990s has been estimated at 28% for
household products, 21 % for domestic electrical applications, 8% for battery
casings, 12% for pharmaceutical/cosmetic packaging and a large figure of 3 1%
for other applications.
Glass-reinforced grades of SAN exhibit a modulus several times that of the
unfilled polymer and, as with other glass-filled polymers, a reduced coefficient
of thermal expansion and lower moulding shrinkage. The materials are thus of
interest on account of their high stiffness and dimensional stability.
One unusual but nevertheless important application of SAN has been in the
manufacture of polymer polyols used in the manufacture of flexible polyurethane
foams. Proportions of up to 40% of the polyol may be used to increase stiffness
as foam bulk densities are lowered (see Section 27.5.4).
16.8 ABS PLASTICS
Although tough enough for many uses, styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers are
inadequate in this respect for other purposes. As a consequence, a range of
442 Plastics Based on Styrene
materials popularly referred to as ABS polymers first became available in the early
1950s. Since that time the ABS polymers have become well established, with
production now of the order of 3 X 10' tonnes per annum and thus in tonnage terms
only surpassed by the 'big four'; polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC and
polystyrene. In particular, the material has become of considerable importance for
quality equipment housings. The reasons for its widespread acceptance are:
(1) High impact resistance.
( 2 ) Good stiffness.
( 3 ) Excellent surface quality.
(4) High dimensional stability at elevated temperatures.
(5) Good chemical resistance.
( 6 ) Good stress cracking resistance.
Its main disadvantages are:
(1) Lack of transparency.
( 2 ) Poor weathering resistance.
(3) Poor flame resistance.
16.8.1 Production of ABS materials
The term ABS was originally used as a general term to describe various blends and
copolymers containing acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene. Prominent among the
earliest materials were physical blends of acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers (SAN)
(which are glassy) and acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymers (which are rubbery).
Such materials are now obsolete but are referred to briefly below, as Type 1
materials, since they do illustrate some basic principles. Today the term ABS
usually refers to a product consisting of discrete cross-linked polybutadiene rubber
particles that are grafted with SAN and embedded in a SAN matrix.
The Type 1 materials may be produced by blending on a two-roll mill or in an
internal mixer or blending the lattices followed by coagulation or spray drying.
In these circumstances the two materials are compatible and there is little
improvement in the impact strength. If, however, the rubber is lightly crosslinked by the use of small quantities of peroxide the resultant reduction in
compatibility leads to considerable improvements in impact strength (see Figures
16.14 and 16.15).A wide range of polymers may be made according to the nature
of each copolymer and the proportion of each employed." A typical blend would
consist of
7 0 parts (70:30 styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer)
40 parts (63:35 butadiene-acrylonitrile rubber).
By altering theses variables, blends may be produced to give products varying
in processability, toughness, low-temperature toughness and heat resistance.
Although the nitrile rubbers employed normally contain about 35% acrylonitrile the inclusion of nitrile rubber with a higher butadiene content will increase
the toughness at low temperatures. For example, whereas the typical blend cited
above has an impact strength of only 0.9 ft Ibf in-' notch at O'F, a blend of 70
parts styrene-acrylonitrile, 30 parts of nitrile rubber (35% acrylonitrile) and 10
parts nitrile rubber (26% acrylonitrile) will have an impact value of 4.5 ftlbf in-'
notch at that temperature. I '
From Figure 16.13 it will be seen that a minimum of about 20% cross-linked
nitrile rubber is required in order to obtain tough products. For high-impact
ABS Plastics
443
NITRILE RUBB
Figure 16.13. Variation in impact strength against concentration of rubber in ABS Type 1 blends"
material the acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers should have a high molecular
weight. The commercial copolymers containing 20-30% acrylonitrile are
suitable for the preparation of Type 1 ABS polymers. The amount of gelled
rubber also has a profound effect on the strength, as shown in Figure 16.14. The
samples used were prepared by milling the rubber and peroxide for 15 minutes,
the styrene-acrylonitrile resin then being added and blended for a further 15
minutes. The physical nature of the blend is more complex than with the SBRmodified polystyrene, as it appears that rubber molecule networks may exist in
the resin phase.
0'
Figure
I
I
1.0
20
T-BUTYL HYOROPEROWIDE CONTENT IN
%
0
Effect of cross-linking agent on impact strength of 75/25 styrene-acrylonitrile/ nitrile
rubber blend.
To produce the Type 2 polymers, styrene and acrylonitrile are added to
polybutadiene latex and the mixture warmed to about 50°C to allow absorption
of the monomers. A water-soluble initiator such as potassium persulphate is
then added to polymerise the styrene and acrylonitrile. The resultant materials
will be a mixture of polybutadiene, polybutadiene grafted with acrylonitrile
and styrene, and styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer. The presence of graft
polymer is essential since straightforward mixtures of polybutadiene and
styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers are weak. In addition to emulsion processes
such as those described above, mass and mass/suspension processes are also
of importance.
444 Plastics Based on Styrene
The resulting polymers may vary in the following respects:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
SAN-rubber ratio;
the styrene to acrylonitrile ratio in the SAN component;
the amount of grafted SAN;
rubber particle size and particle size distribution;
cross-link density of the rubber;
(f) use of modified styrenes such as a-methyl styrene to increase heat deflection
temperatures;
(g) use of saturated rubbers instead of polybutadiene to improve
weatherability.
It is obvious that the range of possible ABS-type polymers is very large. Not
only may the ratios of the three monomers be varied but the way in which they
can be assembled into the final polymer can also be the subject of considerable
modifications. Neither is it necessary to be restricted to the use of acrylontirile,
butadiene, and styrene. Because of the wide range of products available and
because the chemical nature of these materials is rarely divulged it is not possible
to give detailed properties of these materials unless one resorts to lists of
properties of named proprietary materials. In general, however, these materials
have a high impact strength, have softening points as high as, and sometimes
higher than, general purpose polystyrene, and moulded specimens generally have
a very good surface appearance. Some typical properties of ABS polymers
compared with other styrene-containing polymers are given in Table 16.5.
In recent years there has been an increased demand for a variety of special
ABS grades, for example products with improved flame retardancy.
Improvements in flame retardancy have been met in two ways:
(1) By the use of fire-retardant additives.
( 2 ) By blending ABS with PVC.
Bromine compounds are often used as flame retardant additives but
15-20pts phr may be required. This is not only expensive but such large levels
lead to a serious loss of toughness. Of the bromine compounds, octabromodiphenyl ether has been particularly widely used. However, recent concern about
the possibility of toxic decomposition products and the difficulty of finding
alternative flame retarders for ABS has led to the loss of ABS in some markets
where fire retardance is important. Some of this market has been taken up by
ABS/PVC and ASA/PVC blends and some by systems based on ABS or ASA
(see Section 16.9) with polycarbonates. Better levels of toughness may be
achieved by the use of ABSPVC blends but the presence of the PVC lowers the
processing stability.
There is also a demand for glass-clear forms of ABS since standard forms are
opaque. This can be achieved by matching the refractive indices (p,) of the rubber
particle, graft and matrix phases and eliminating any additives or polymerisation
ingredients that may cause opacity. A variety of approaches have been used
including the use of SBR or carboxy-terminated NBR to modify the refractive
index of the rubber phase and to use terpolymers of methyl methacrylate, styrene
and acrylontrile instead of the normal SAN. In such applications it is important
that the refractive index match should be over the operating temperature
range.
s?
vi
446 Plastics Bused on Styrene
There has also been a demand in recent years for an ABS-type material with
an enhanced heat distortion temperature. In ABS polymers this is largely
controlled by the Tg of the resin or glassy component. Consequently three
approaches to raising the distortion temperature have been developed. They
are:
(1) Replacement, in full or in part, of the styrene by a monomer whose
homopolymer has a higher Tg than polystyrene. In the case of partial
replacement it is also important that the copolymers have Tgs intermediate to
the two homopolymers. Fortunately this is usually the case.
(2) The addition of third monomers that enhance T g .
(3) Blending the glassy phase polymer with another polymer of higher Tg such
as a polycarbonate.
The first approach has been important commercially. The monomer most
commonly used is a-methylstyrene (see Section 16.11), whose polymer has a Tg
of about 120°C. The heat distortion temperature of the resultant-ABS type
polymer will depend on the level of replacement of styrene by the a-methylstyrene. (It may be noted in passing that a-methylstyrene-acrylonitrile binary
copolymers have been available as alternatives to styrene-acrylonitrile materials
but have not achieved commercial significance.)
The second approach is typified by maleic anhydride. This material does not
homopolymerise but will polymerise with styrene or styrene and acrylonitirle, in
the latter case to give terpolymers with Tg above 122°C.
Blends of ABS with polycarbonates have been available for several years (e.g.
Bayblend by Bayer and Cycoloy by Borg-Warner). In many respects these
polymers have properties intermediate to the parent plastics materials with heat
distortion temperatures up to 130°C. They also show good impact strength,
particularly at low temperatures. Self-extinguishing and flame retarding grades
have been made available. The materials thus provide possible alternatives to
modified poly(pheny1ene oxides) of the Noryl type described in Chapter 21. (See
also sections 16.16 and 20.8.)
The process of blending with another glassy polymer to raise the heat
distortion temperature is not restricted to polycarbonate, and the polysulphones
are obvious candidates because of their higher T g .One blend has been offered
(Arylon T by USS Chemicals) which has a higher softening point than the ABSpolycarbonates.
Blending of ABS with other polymers is not restricted to the aim of raising the
distortion temperature. Blends with PVC are made for various purposes. For
example, 80:20 ABSPVC blends are used to produce fire-retarding ABS-type
materials, as already mentioned, while 10:90 blends are considered as impactmodified forms of unplasticised PVC. ABS materials have also been blended
with plasticised PVC to give a crashpad sheet material.
Blending of ABS with an acrylic material such as poly(methy1 methacrylate)
can in some cases allow a matching of the refractive indices of the rubbery
and glassy phases and providing that there is a low level of contaminating
material such as soap and an absence of insoluble additives a reasonable
transparent ABS-type polymer may be obtained. More sophisticated are the
complex terpolymers and blends of the MBS type considered below. Seldom
used on their own, they are primarily of use as impact modifiers for
unplasticised PVC.
ABS Plastics
447
16.8.2 Processing of ABS Materials
The processing behaviour of ABS plastics is largely predictable from their
chemical nature, in particular their amorphous nature and the somewhat
unpleasant degradation products. The main points to bear in mind are:
(1) ABS is more hygroscopic than polystyrene. (It will absorb up to 0.3%
moisture in 24 hours.) It must therefore be dried carefully before moulding
or extrusion.
(2) The heat resistance in the melt is not so good as that of polystyrene and
unpleasant fumes may occur if the melt is overheated. This can occur at the
higher end of the processing range (250-260°C) and when high screw speeds
and high back pressures are used when injection moulding. Volatile
decomposition products can also lead to bubbles, mica marks (splay marks),
and other moulding defects. The problem is often worse with flame-retarding
grades. It is usual to purge the material at the end of a run.
(3) The flow properties vary considerably between grades but some grades are
not free flowing. Flow path ratios in the range 80 to 150:1 are usually quoted,
generally being lower with the heat-resistant grades.
(4) Being amorphous, the materials have a low moulding shrinkage
(0.044-0.008 cm/cm).
One particular feature of the material is the facility with which it may be
electroplated. In order to obtain a good bond the ABS polymer is first treated by
an acid etching process which dissolves out some of the rubber particles at or
near the polymer surface. After sensitisation and activation electroless metal
deposition processes are carried out. Much of the strength between the ABS and
the plating depends on a mechanical press-stud type of effect. It is commonly
observed that low peel strength usually arises not through failure at the interface
but in the moulding just below the surface. It would seem that the greater the
molecular orientation in such regions the lower the interlayer forces and hence
the lower the peel strength.
16.8.3 Properties and Applications of ABS Plastics
Because of the range of ABS polymers that may be produced, a wide range of
properties is exhibited by these materials. Properties of particular importance are
toughness and impact resistance, dimensional stability, good heat distortion
resistance (relative to the major tonnage thermoplastics), good low-temperature
properties and their capability of being electroplated without great difficulty.
Several classes of ABS which show the above general characteristics but with
specific attributes are recognised. One supplier for example classifies ABS
materials into the following categories:
general purpose grades
fire retardant grades
improved heat resistance grades
enhanced chemically resistant grades
static dissipation grades
extrusion grades
fire retardant extrusion grades
448 Plastics Based on Styrene
transparent grades
electroplating grades
blow moulding grades.
Over the years there has been some difference in the balance of use between
UPVC and ABS in the United States compared with Western Europe. This was
due largely to the earlier development in Western Europe of UPVC and in the
United States of ABS. Thus, for example, whilst ABS consolidated its use for
pipes and fittings in the United States, UPVC was finding similar uses in Europe.
Whilst some of these traditional differences remain, ABS is now well established
in both Europe and the United States.
As well as unplasticised PVC, ABS also finds competition from polypropylene. In recent years polypropylene has been the cheaper material on a tonnage
basis and even more economic on the more relevant volume basis. On the
other hand the properties listed above, in particular the extreme toughness and
superior heat distortion resistance, lead to ABS being preferred in many
instances. Because ABS, typically, has a higher flexural modulus than
polypropylene, mouldings of the latter will have to a wall thickness some
15-25% greater in order to show an equal stiffness. It is also interesting to
note that because of its higher specific heat as well as possessing a latent heat
of fusion, polypropylene requires longer cooling times when processing (see
Section 8.2.3). Applications of ABS are considered in more detail in Section
16.16.
16.9 MISCELLANEOUS RUBBER-MODIFIED
STYRENE-ACRYLONITRILE AND RELATED COPOLYMERS
The commercial success of ABS polymers has led to the investigation of many
other polyblend materials. In some cases properties are exhibited which are
superior to those of ABS and some of the materials are commercially available.
For example, the opacity of ABS has led to the development of blends in
which the glassy phase is modified to give transparent polymers whilst the
limited light aging has been countered by the use of rubbers other than
polybutadiene.
Notable among the alternative materials are the MBS polymers, in which
methyl methacrylate and styrene are grafted on to the polybutadiene backbone.
This has resulted in two clear-cut advantages over ABS. The polymers could
be made with high clarity and they had better resistance to discolouration in
the presence of ultraviolet light. Disadvantages of MBS systems are that they
have lower tensile strength and heat deflection temperature under load.
The MBS polymers are two-phase materials, with the components being
only partially compatible. It is, however, possible to match the refractive
indices providing the copolymerisation is homogeneous, i.e. copolymers
produced at the beginning of the reaction have the same composition as
copolymers produced at the end. Such homogeneity of polymerisation appears
to be achieved without great difficulty. The poor aging of ABS appears to be
due largely to oxidative attack at the double bonds in the polybutadiene
backbone. Methyl methacrylate appears to inhibit or at least retard this process
whereas acrylonitrile does not.