Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (22.17 MB, 1,782 trang )
Nation saw the socialist specter “gaining among the working-classes all over the world” and
declared one had to be “wilfully blind” to “imagine that America is going to escape the convulsion.”
Charles Loring Brace insisted that “there are just the same explosive social elements beneath the
surface of New York as of Paris,” and the Times concurred. The “terrible proletaire class” had
already shown its revolutionary head during the draft riots, the Times recalled, when for a few days
in 1863, “New York seemed like Paris, under the Reds in 1870.” Now matters were arguably worse,
as there were “communist leaders and ‘philosophers’ and reformers” in New York, ready to stir up
the “seething, ignorant, passionate, half-criminal class” who “hate and envy the rich.” Should “some
such opportunity occur as was present in Paris,” we should soon see “a sudden storm of communistic
revolutions even in New York such as would astonish all who do not know these classes.”
ORANGE AND GREEN
In early July 1871 a group of Protestant Irish-Americans—the Loyal Order of Orange—requested
police permission to march through the city streets to celebrate the Battle of the Boyne. Irish Catholic
organizations protested that the parade would be an insult to their community and pointed to the
Orangemen’s behavior the previous July 12, when they had marched up Eighth Avenue to Elm Park on
92nd Street. As they went they had taunted residents of Hell’s Kitchen, Irish Catholic laborers laying
pipelines in 59th Street, and others who were broadening the boulevard farther uptown. They’d
spewed epithets and sung insulting tunes, such as “Croppies, Lie Down,” whose refrain ended: “Our
foot on the neck of the Croppy we’ll keep.” A crowd of enraged workmen followed along and
attacked the Elm Park picnickers with stones and clubs. Shots were exchanged, and eight people were
killed.
Such disgraceful scenes, the Catholics argued, must not be repeated. The Orangemen sought “race
ascendancy,” argued Patrick Ford, Galway-born editor of the recently established Irish World. They
hoped, in league with the nativist “Anglo-American element,” to make the United States a thoroughly
“Saxon” nation. But the United States, Ford argued, articulating what would emerge as a major strand
of metropolitan thought and feeling, was in fact a multicultured construction—“a political, not a
natural, nation.” “This people are not one,” Ford insisted. “In blood, in religion, in traditions, in
social and domestic habits, they are many.” It was wrong, therefore, to ask non-English residents to
“ignore their own identity and origin” and “become Yankees first, before they can be regarded as
Americans.”
City authorities agreed, noting that the use of abusive language or gesture in public streets was a
misdemeanor and that courts had declared no organization had the right to provoke violence by
inflaming the passions of other groups. On July 10, with Tweed’s backing, Police Superintendent
James J. Kelso forbade the parade. Irish organizations and Archbishop John McCloskey (who had
succeeded John Hughes on his death in 1864) applauded the decision.
Now Protestants protested. The next day, indignant Wall Street businessmen lined up outside the
Produce Exchange to sign a petition denouncing the edict. Leading newspapers raged at the cowardly
surrender to a Catholic mob and demanded an instant reversal. Protestant New Yorkers viewed the
parade issue through the prism of events in France. Thus the Herald argued that Irish Catholic
outcries against Orangemen manifested “the same spirit which prompted the Paris Commune.”
Protestants also feared that Catholic political power menaced republican liberties, an old worry
recently revived by Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864), eighty in all, that condemned such
tendencies of the bourgeois era as naturalism, rationalism, separation of church and state, liberty of
conscience, and (error number eighty) the notion that “the Roman Pontiff can and ought to reconcile
himself and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” The Times suggested
that Catholics intended to set up a state church and drive Protestants “to take shelter in holes and
corners,” and Thomas Nast, cartoonist for Harper’s, fashioned images of mitred crocodiles slithering
up on the beaches of America.
“The American River Ganges: The Priests and the Children,” by Thomas Nast,
Harper’s Weekly, September 30, 1871. (General Research. The New York Public
Library. Astor, Lenox and Tilden Foundations)
These anxieties had been boosted by Tammanyite Mayor Abraham Oakey Hall, who had taken to
reviewing the St. Patrick’s Day parade in full Irish regalia, showing up at balls in bottle-green flytail
coats and emerald silk shirts, and jocularly claiming his initials really stood for “Ancient Order of
Hibernians.” Tweed and company had, moreover, authorized state and city aid to parochial schools
and Catholic private charities: the Church got nearly $1,500,000 from public sources between 1869
and 1871. To the Tribune it seemed quite apparent that the Irish, “under the leadership of Mr.
William M. Tweed, had taken possession of this City and State.” Superintendent Kelso’s order
banning the Orange Parade seemed brutal confirmation of this.
Protestants also fought the banning order because it gave comfort to Irish nationalists, Fenians
chief among them. After the war, the Fenians had come up from underground, declared themselves a
sovereign government-in-exile, and hoisted their harp-and-sunburst flag over the old Moffat mansion
(opposite Union Square), now their capitol. A faction led by William R. Roberts, a wealthy New
York dry-goods merchant, pushed to capture British Canada and hold it hostage for Irish
independence. This would hopefully embroil the United States in an Anglo-American war, during
which Ireland could break for freedom.
This program roused tremendous enthusiasm among New York’s working-class Irish. In March
1866 over a hundred thousand turned out for a Fenian rally in Jones’ Woods—despite the opposition
of Archbishop McCloskey. The savings of domestics and longshoremen (not, for the most part, the
more conservative Irish middle classes) helped purchase a cache of arms from the U.S. government.
But money, enthusiasm, and some tacit support from American officials still fuming at England’s
Confederate leanings were no substitute for military competence, and the Fenian invasion forces were
easily routed by Canadian militiamen.
This invasion fiasco stimulated the growth of the Clan na Gael (founded 1867), a far more
disciplined and secretive organization. Because Irish nationalists retained broad popular support,
they were vigorously wooed by Tammany politicians, and Grant Republicans gave them federal jobs
in New York City. But leading Irish exiles aligned themselves with the International, which strongly
supported Irish independence. Ford of the Irish World linked the nationalist cause to radical
enthusiasms by denouncing the “money interest” as “a huge boa constrictor” that “has wound itself
about the nation, crushing its bones and sucking the life blood from its heart.”
This combination of concerns about Commune-style radicalism, Irish Catholicism’s growing
power in the city, and the emergence of left-leaning Irish nationalism generated intense elite pressure
on Tammany to reverse its stand and let the Orangemen parade. Tweed, already feeling the heat from
some initial exposés of Tammany corruption, decided he had no choice but to acquiesce. Governor
Hoffman came down from Albany on the eleventh and, after conferring with Tweed and Hall,
rescinded Kelso’s decision. He also ordered regiments of National Guardsmen and cavalry to guard
the marchers the following day.
SLAUGHTER ON EIGHTH AVENUE
July 12 dawned bright and hot. Five thousand troops reported to their armories at seven A.M. Some
were old hands at this kind of thing—notably the elite Seventh Regiment. At the other extreme was the
new-minted Ninth Regiment, a Jim Fisk creation. The master of Erie had bankrolled the troop but put
far more energy into its scarlet-coated hundred-piece band than into imparting military discipline.
Most Guardsmen were Protestant employees of the city’s financial and business firms (the Irish Sixtyninth would be kept in its armory all day). Most shared their employers’ fear or hatred of the tenement
house denizens whose paths they would cross that day. In addition to the military, fifteen hundred
policemen gathered at headquarters in Mulberry Street.
Catholic forces readied themselves as well. For a week there had been vigorous debates in
nationalist circles about how to respond should a parade go forward. Ancient Order of Hibernians
lodges around New York and Brooklyn had called for violent resistance. Some had undergone street
drills in preparation. Fenian leaders were in unusual agreement with the Catholic hierarchy that
violence would only make the Irish appear incapable of self-government, but neither priests nor
moderate nationalists had much influence that morning.
From all over the city groups of people made their way toward Lamartine Hall, on the northwest
corner of Eighth Avenue and 29th Street, where the Orangemen were forming up their tiny contingent.
The Green forces came from scattered worksites: longshoremen from East River docks, laborers from
the Jackson and Badgers Foundry on 14th Street, plasterers, Boulevard workers, quarrymen at Mount
Morris, Central Park laborers, men doing repairs on the Third Avenue Railroad or digging sewers in
Fourth Avenue or manning the Harlem Gas Works. They came from a morning mass meeting at
Hibernian Hall—Ancient Order of Hibernians headquarters, at Prince and Mulberry—where there
had already been a violent clash with the Eighty-fourth Regiment and the police (except for two
“copps” who had refused to fight fellow Irishmen and been promptly fired and jailed). And, of
course, they came from the working-class quarters, from Mackerelville (around 13th Street between
First Avenue and Avenue A), from Yorkville, from Brooklyn, and—in greatest numbers—from Hell’s
Kitchen.
By 1:30 crowds lined both sides of Eighth Avenue, from 21st to 33rd, and jammed the cross
streets. Most were laborers, wearing the long black coats and dirty white shirts of their calling. Many
neighborhood women mingled in the crowd, and others took up positions at windows and on roofs
(reminding one reporter of “the Paris pétroleuse”).
Now the troops and police arrived and took up their positions, to jeers and hisses. At two o’clock,
the Orange women and children were sent off, and the men donned their regalia (often with pistols
under their coats) and formed up in 29th Street. The men of the Eighty-fourth Regiment, to make clear
their unabashed sympathy with the marchers, placed their caps on their bayonets and cheered. The
Orangemen were now surrounded by regimental units—the Seventh in front, Sixth and Ninth in rear,
Twenty-second and Eighty-fourth to the sides. After some preliminary street clearing by mounted and
club-wielding police, a cannon was fired, the band played “The Star-Spangled Banner,” the
Orangemen unfurled their purple silk banner of the Prince Glorious on horseback, and the parade set
off.
Almost immediately, to howls of “Give them hell, the infernal Englishmen!” a shower of stones,
bricks, bottles, and old shoes was unleashed. Some militiamen fired musket shots, pistols were fired
from the crowd, police charged and clubbed the bystanders, and the parade moved ahead. A block
further on came more stones and sniper fire; Seventh Regiment soldiers responded, on command, with
sporadic shots. Eighth Avenue ahead of the line of march grew choked with crowds. The procession
“The Orange Riot of July 12th,” from Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, July 29,
1871. This view shows the soldiers firing into protesters massed on the east side of
Eighth Avenue near 24th Street. (Courtesy of American Social History Project.
Graduate School and University Center. City University of New York)
halted. One woman broke through the troops and tore the regalia off an Orangeman before being
pushed back at bayonet point, shrieking and raging. The police smashed into the crowd ahead, bashing
heads open. Stones and crockery rained down from rooftops and windows. More gunshots rang out.
Two Eighty-fourth Guardsmen were hit. The troops, without orders and without warning, began
blasting volleys at pointblank range into the throngs along the sidewalk at 24th Street. Other regiments
began firing indiscriminately into the screaming and terrified crowds. Mounted police followed up
with charges.
The parade re-formed ranks. The band struck up a festive Orange tune, banners were lifted aloft,
and the assemblage ground on. The police had to batter their way into 23rd Street, where immense
numbers had regrouped at Booth’s Theater, but the parade successfully negotiated the left turn and
headed east, its rear protected from angry crowds, until it reached Fifth Avenue, where, for a moment,
it entered a different world: at the Fifth Avenue Hotel, two to three thousand well-dressed people
cheered lustily. Further ovations greeted them as they made their way south along Fifth Avenue. Then
marchers and troops and police entered Rialto territory at 14th Street. Once again they had to wade
through hissing and jeering crowds (except for Protestant oases like the American Bible Society
building, from which girls merrily waved orange ribbons). Wearily they made their way across town
toward Cooper Union, where finally, at four o’clock, they shed their regalia and quietly dispersed.
Back at Eighth Avenue it was quiet too, apart from the groans of the injured and dying and the
lamentations of priests and women. A shaken Herald correspondent found the steps of a basement
barbershop “were smeared and slippery with human blood and brains while the landing beneath was
covered two inches deep with clotted gore, pieces of brain, and the half digested contents of a human
stomach and intestines.” The walls of a butter store, he observed, were “speckled with bullet marks
and splashed with blood,” and the sidewalk in front was “thickly coated with a red mud.”
Over sixty civilians were killed outright or later died from wounds. Over one hundred were
wounded (and another hundred arrested). Most were Irish laborers, but there were many German and
American casualties. Twenty-odd policemen were injured by stones, clubs, and rocks, and four were
shot, none fatally. Three Guardsmen were killed (possibly by wild firing from other troops) and
twenty-two injured. One Orangeman was wounded.
The next day twenty thousand Irish mourners converged on Bellevue’s morgue, adjacent to the
outpatient dispensary for the poor, to pay respects. Massive funeral processions, composed of somber
delegations from the Society of the Immaculate Conception, St. Patrick’s Mutual Alliance, and the
Ancient Order of Hibernians in white mourning scarves, traveled by the Greenpoint ferry to
Brooklyn’s Calvary Cemetery. There were other, angrier responses to what Ford’s Irish World
called the “Slaughter on Eighth Avenue.” The Brooklyn Irish hanged Governor Hoffman in effigy in a
parade down Hamilton Avenue, and barroom poets composed ballads like “The Great Orange
Massacre.” There were, however, prominent nationalists—Fenians and Irish Brigade Association
leaders from the ranks of business and the professional classes—who distanced themselves from the
whole affair, a sign of divisions to come.
The day after the riot, fashionable men and women rode along Eighth Avenue in comfortable
carriages, matching up street corners or buildings with descriptions in the morning papers. But the
forces of order, while triumphant, were also in a fury. One banker declared that the riot eclipsed “the
worst religious outrage of the Commune.” A Times editor found it final proof that the “Dangerous
Classes” cared nothing for “our liberty or civilization” other than to “come forth in the darkness and
in times of disturbance, to plunder and prey on the good things which surround them.” Police
Commissioner (and banker) Henry Smith only regretted “that there were not a larger number killed.”
As he explained to the Tribune, “in any large city such a lesson was needed every few years. Had one
thousand of the rioters been killed, it would have had the effect of completely cowing the remainder.”
Democratic authorities got no points for having ordered out the troops. Their “criminal weakness
and vacillation,” the Tribune charged, had encouraged the mob in the first place. One of the reasons
many in the upper and middle classes had grudgingly acquiesced in Tammany’s hold on power was
its presumed ability to maintain political stability. That saving grace was gone: Tweed could not keep
the Irish in line. The time had come, said Congregational minister Merrill Richardson from the pulpit
of his fashionable Madison Avenue church, to take back New York City, for if “the higher classes
will not govern, the lower classes mil.”
TWEED TOPPLED
Six months earlier, Tweed had seemed impregnable, despite assaults by the New York Times and the
vitriolic Harper’s Weekly cartoons of Thomas Nast, which portrayed Tweed as a leering hulk of
corruption and Tammany’s inner circle as a conspiratorial Ring. The campaign, long on invective,
was short on facts, and the Times insisted the city’s books be examined. Just before the election,
Mayor Hall established a blue ribbon panel of six businessmen with unimpeachable reputations—
including rentier John Jacob Astor, banker Moses Taylor, and Marshall O. Roberts of the West Side
Association—and gave them access to municipal accounts. On election eve, the panel issued its
findings. The books had been “faithfully kept,” avowed these leading beneficiaries of Tweed’s
policies, and the debt levels were manageable. Tweed and his men swept to victory.
Accordingly, 1871 had looked to be a very good year. On New Year’s Day, A. Oakey Hall was
again sworn in as mayor, and John T. Hoffman took office as governor. With luck, by 1872, Hoffman
would be president, Hall would move up to governor, and Tweed would become a United States
senator. The annual Americus Club Ball, held in early January at Indian Harbor, Connecticut (near
Tweed’s summer place at Greenwich), was a jubilant affair. As late as May, Tweed was still riding
high. On May 31 he arranged a spectacular wedding, at Trinity Chapel, for his daughter Mary Amelia.
At the Delmonico’s-catered reception that followed at Tweed’s Fifth Avenue (and 43rd Street)
mansion, guests brought a vast outpouring of dazzling gifts (including forty sets of sterling silver).
Tammany’s growth-oriented coalition, like the Gilded Age boom itself, was in fine fettle.
Within weeks, however, the visceral response to the Commune and the Orange Riot had rallied
support for the war the Times and Harper’s were waging against Tweedite corruption. On July 22,
ten days after the Boyne Day battle, the Times began publishing solid evidence of Ring rascality,
turned over to the paper by an aggrieved insider. Day after day, publisher George Jones reproduced
whole pages from the cooked account books of James Watson, who until his recent death in a
sleighing accident up in Harlem Lane had been the Ring’s trusted bookkeeper. The series culminated
in a special fourpage supplement, on July 29, that quickly sold out its run of two hundred thousand
copies. Under screaming headlines—“Gigantic Frauds of the Ring Exposed”—the paper detailed
Watson’s system of kickbacks. Contractors on public projects padded their bills and slipped the
overcharge back under the table. The surcharge to the city usually ranged from 10 to 85 percent,
though on occasions it soared to truly empyrean heights of corruption. One member of a Tweedaffiliated club was paid $23,553.51 for furnishing thirty-six awnings, boosting the per-awning price
from the market rate of $12.50 to a Ring rate of $654.26. Construction of the county courthouse
allowed for an orgy of such creative accounting, and the building wound up costing four times as
much as the Houses of Parliament and twice the price of Alaska.
The Times stories brought to a head a growing international crisis of confidence in New York
City’s ability to pay its debts. Earlier in the year, rumors of mismanagement had so undermined trust
that only the unimpeachable credentials of the city’s underwriters were keeping New York’s
securities afloat. Now overseas bankers refused to extend further credit. The Berlin stock exchange
struck the city’s bonds from its official list.
This jolted New York’s financial and mercantile community into action. Mammoth interest
payments on outstanding debt were due in weeks, and in a few months twenty-five million dollars’
worth of short-term notes would come due for payment. If the city’s credit collapsed, noted Henry
Clews, a leading private banker, every bank in New York might go down with it. It was time, Qews
said, to oust “this brazen band of plunderers, root and branch.”
On a Monday evening in early September, after the elite had returned from their summer vacations,
a great reform meeting was held at Cooper Union. In attendance, besides Republicans, nativists, civil
service reformers, and frightened financiers, were powerful upper-class Democrats, like corporate
lawyer Samuel J. Tilden, who had been forced to take a back seat to Tweed; Germans, led by StaatsZeitung editor Oswald Ottendorfer, who had felt pushed aside by the Irish; and those small property
owners, merchants, and manufacturers who feared Tammany corruption would hike taxes and
pauperize them.
The meeting quickly agreed that the “wisest and best citizens” should take control of the city
government—as intellectuals and reform groups had been arguing since the draft riots. Extremists,
Godkin of the Nation among them, talked cholerically of forming a Vigilance Committee to lynch
Tweed. Cooler heads established instead an Executive Committee of Citizens and Taxpayers for
Financial Reform of the City, popularly known as the Committee of Seventy. Chaired by sugar refiner
William Havemeyer, and packed with Bar Association lawyers, it decided to bring Tweed down by
choking off the city’s funds. Setting up offices in the Brown Brothers building—making the banking
house de facto center of city government—the committee spearheaded a concerted refusal by a
thousand property owners to pay municipal taxes until the books of the city were audited. On
September 7 they went before Judge Barnard, who now deserted his former comrades and gave them
an injunction that barred Comptroller Connolly from issuing new bonds or spending any money. As
Tweed later noted, this “destroyed all our power to raise money from the banks or elsewhere and left
us trapped.” Crowds of workmen now gathered at City Hall demanding their pay—a crisis relieved
only temporarily by Tweed’s handing out fifty thousand dollars from his own pocket. Organized labor
turned against him too, even those in the construction trades who had benefited mightily from his
programs. On Wednesday, September 13, eight thousand workmen marched in the rain to City Hall to
denounce Tammany rule.
Five days later, Comptroller Connolly jumped ship. At Committee of Seventy insistence, he
appointed Tilden associate Andrew Haswell Green as acting comptroller. Escorted by a hollow
square of mounted policemen, Green took possession of the office, giving investigators access to Ring
financial records and further isolating Tweed. (Barnard allowed the city to borrow from the banks
again, but only departments not under Tweed’s control.) At the end of October Green and Tilden
traced money from city contractors directly to Tweed’s bank account, and the following day Tweed
was arrested, though immediately released on a million dollars bail.
Tweed appealed to the ballot box and held rallies on the Lower East Side, to no avail. In the
November 1871 elections—with the polls closely guarded—Tweed retained his state senate seat
(and he would remain a Robin Hood hero, “poverty’s best screen,” to his local constituents), but most
of his associates were defeated by wide margins. Ring members large and small slipped out of the
city for foreign climes. Tweed stood his ground. Indicted in December, he was arrested, forced to
resign his powerful public works position, and voted out as grand sachem of Tammany.
His personal world unraveled too. In January 1872 his old comrade Jim Fisk was fatally shot,
while walking up the marble staircase of the Grand Central Hotel, by Edward S. Stokes, the
spendthrift son of a prominent New York family, who had taken up with Fisk’s mistress Josie
Mansfield. As he lay dying, Tweed (out on bail) was at his side. Another bedside mourner was Jay
Gould, who had his own problems, stemming directly from Tweed’s fall. The Erie president’s
powerful enemies had been circling, but he had successfully fended them off with the aid of Tweed’s
judges. Now Tweed was forced to resign from the Erie board of directors, Judge Barnard was
impeached and convicted (at the insistence of the Bar Association), and Gould’s position became
untenable. He too was forced to resign.
Though his power was shattered, Tweed continually wriggled out of reach of his prosecutors. His
trial in January 1873 ended with a hung—some said bribed—jury. In November 1873 he fared less
well and was sentenced to a twelve-year term. But after a year in jail, the decision was reversed, and
in January 1875 he was released. His enemies immediately slapped him with a civil suit to recover
six million of his ill-gotten gains. Unable to come up with the three-million-dollar bail, he was
reincarcerated and languished in Ludlow Street Jail. The monotony was broken, however, by
repeated home furloughs. In the course of one of these, he escaped and made his way to Florida, then
to Cuba, then (disguised as a seaman) attempted to flee to Spain. Arrested by Spanish authorities,
Tweed was delivered to an American warship for return to New York. Back again in the Ludlow
Street Jail, and now desperate, he agreed to testify (in return for his freedom) about the workings of
the Ring. After he did so at great length, however, vengeful authorities (including now-governor
Tilden) refused to release him. His spirit broken, he died in prison, of a combination of diseases, on
April 12, 1878.
To consolidate their takeover of municipal power, the Committee of Seventy ran their own
chairman, William Havemeyer, for the mayoralty in 1872. Havemeyer, now sixty-eight, had been
mayor in 1848-49 and didn’t like much of what had happened since then. Elected to City Hall in a
divided campaign, Havemeyer and Comptroller Andrew Haswell Green imposed a vigorous
retrenchment policy on New York. They laid off city workers and cut salaries of government
officials, hoping to drive out professional politicians and draw in public-spirited elites. They jammed
the brakes on development to cut costs and lower the taxes of the propertied classes who were
Havemeyer’s biggest supporters. Work on the uptown boulevards ceased. Grading of West Side
thoroughfares was halted. The viaduct railway was scuttled. Central Park expansion (and
maintenance) was curtailed, and work on the proposed Riverside and Morningside parks was pushed
off into the future. The elaborate plans to develop the waterfront were canceled and a cheaper, more
circumscribed plan adopted. Declaring the city “finished,” the mayor even argued that New York
should refuse any further assistance to the Brooklyn Bridge, then rising in the East River
Also in 1872, some of the outraged businessmen and professionals who had toppled Tweed tried
to displace the corruption-ridden Grant administration. The collection of dissidents formed a third
party, called themselves Liberal Republicans, and nominated the sixty-one-year-old Horace Greeley
to run against President Grant. The Democratic Party seconded Greeley’s nomination, hoping to ride
his coattails to the White House—against the better judgment of Democratic national chairman August
Belmont, who thought the Greeley nomination “one of those stupendous mistakes which it is difficult
even to comprehend.” Belmont was right. Grant, the old war hero, aided by boom-time prosperity and
a last spurt of northern outrage at Klan outrages, won every northern state. Few municipal reformers
backed Greeley, whom they saw as too close to the Democratic Party. They endorsed independent
candidates instead, including Frederick Law Olmsted for vice-president. The city’s bourgeoisie stuck
with Grant. “I was the worst beaten man that ever ran for that high office,” Greeley lamented.
Weakened by the arduous campaign and depressed over the death of his wife just before election,
Horace Greeley came home to his beloved New York City to find that Whitelaw Reid had seized
control of the Tribune in his absence. Broken in spirit, he died three weeks later on November 29,
1872.
BACK TO THE TEN-HOUR DAY
Having crushed Tweed, the forces of order lit into the labor movement, which, in the spring of 1872,
had launched its strongest bid yet to institute the eight-hour day. Building trades struck first and, to
their delight, got a boost from President Grant. Bricklayers working on the new post office had
complained to him about ten-hour workloads. Grant, with one eye on the upcoming elections,
denounced this violation of the federal eight-hour law and issued an Executive Proclamation entitling
them to overtime pay. This galvanized other construction workers to join the strike, and by early June
most small building contractors had knuckled under.
Inspired by these successes, other workers downed tools and walked off. Soon twenty thousand—
including plumbers, upholsterers, pianomakers, masons, marble cutters, quarrymen, tin and slate
roofers, sugar refiners, and gas men—were fighting for the eight-hour day. The city’s employers dug
in their heels, and the test of wills spiraled upward into a near-general strike—the biggest labor
conflict in New York’s history thus far—pitting a hundred thousand workers from fifty-two crafts
(two-thirds of the manufacturing workforce) against a newly unified manufacturing elite supported by
most of the city’s bourgeoisie.
The fiercest clashes came in the woodworking trades. In May militant German journeymen of the
Furniture Workers League shut down various woodworking factories. On the other side were the
piano manufacturers, who ran the most highly mechanized and subdivided woodworking trades. The
most vigorous opposition came from Steinway and Sons, a firm far larger and wealthier than most of
the vulnerable cabinetmaker shops who had given in to union demands. Seeking to head off trouble,
the company offered workers at its Fourth Avenue plant an increase in pay if they would stick with
ten hours. When some accepted, a mass meeting of piano workers (held June 5) denounced the rankbreakers and marched, thousands strong, to ring the factory and muscle the ten-hour men away.
Steinway called on the new probusiness city government for police protection, and got it. “Captain
Gunner arrived with about 80 men,” William Steinway noted in his diary, “who charged on the
strikers and clubbed them on the arms and legs, they running as fast as their legs can carry them.”
The Eight-hour Movement—Procession of Workingmen on a “Strike,” in the Bowery,
June 10, 1872, from Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper, June 29, 1872. Note that
many marchers are smoking cigars. Cigar-making remained a major source of
employment in New York, although production was shifting from small craft shops to
factories and tenement houses. (Courtesy of American Social History Project. Graduate
School and University Center. City University of New York)
With momentum faltering, the Iron and Metal Workers League called out its fifteen thousand
members, and the strike revved up again. Crowds of blacksmiths surrounded J. B. Brewster’s
Carriage Factory and the Singer Sewing Machine’s plant—both bastions of the ten-hour day in
metallurgy—and brass founders, pattern makers, wireworkers, pen and pencil makers, church organ
builders, brewery workers, packinghouse butchers, and bakers entered the fray.
Now employers organized. On June 18 the industrialists and building contractors joined forces
with the woodworking bosses and, at a meeting of over four hundred employers, formed an Executive
Committee of the Employers of the City, dedicated to smashing the eight-hour movement—now
depicted as the stalking horse for something far worse. As one steam pump manufacturer harangued
the meeting: “I see behind all this the specter of Communism. Our duty is to take it by the throat and
say it has no business here.”
Soon, indeed, employers brought in the police, who sent platoons, then battalions of men, many of
them recent veterans of the Orange Riot suppression, to club picketers away from plants and open
avenues for scabs. One after another the strikes crumbled. Steinway and Singer triumphed. The iron
men surrendered in July. Many earlier gains were lost, and apart from some in the building trades,