Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (20.34 MB, 413 trang )
SOMATIC CELL GENETICS AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT
49
plant biology. Moreover, defined mutants greatly facilitate the recognition of
rare genetic events such as might result from genetic recombination, mutation,
somatic hybridization, and genetic transformation. Apart from these more
fundamental uses of biochemical mutants, selecting mutants which cause lesions
or alterations in biochemical pathways may be of importance in several aspects
of plant improvement. For example, biochemical mutants could be selected for
disease resistance, improvement of nutritional quality, adaptation of plants to
stress conditions such as occurs in saline soils, elimination of toxins and antimetabolites deleterious to man and animals, and to increase the biosynthesis of
plant products used for medicinal or industrial purposes.
There are only a few cases where mutants which cause a block in a particular
biosynthetic pathway have been recovered in whole plants. These include
thiamine-deficient mutants in Arubidopsis (Langridge, 1955) and tomato (Langridge and Brock, 1961), nitrate reductase deficiency in Arubidopsis (OostindierBraaksma and Feenstra, 1973), and a proline auxotroph in maize (Gavazzi et al.,
1975). Slightly more success has been achieved in isolating mutants which affect
photosynthesis primarily because they affect chloroplast development and can
be readily selected (Levine, 1969; Miles and Daniel, 1974; Miles, 1976). Such
mutants have been valuable in analyzing basic processes in photosynthesis. The
relatively depauperate collection of biochemical mutants in plants probably
results from the expense of screening large populations of whole plants for
relatively rare mutants. As pointed out by Chaleff and Carlson (1974), the
organizational complexity of plants with morphologically and biochemically
different, yet interdependent, cells and structures also hinders the isolation of
defined biochemical mutants.
The ability to manipulate large populations of homogeneous plant cells provides the opportunity to isolate biochemical mutants. Technically it is relatively
simple to screen 106-107 cells in culture; screening a similar number of whole
plants is very resource-consuming. Because plants can be regenerated from cells
of some species the effect of such mutants may be evaluated in mature plants.
Dominant and co-dominant mutants can be isolated from diploid, or indeed,
polyploid cells. It might appear axiomatic that haploid cell lines would be
required to isolate recessive biochemical mutants. However, this might not be
the case. Recessive mutants occur in diploid animal cell lines at a frequency
considerably greater than would be expected from the frequency of a double
mutation event (Terzi, 1974). Recently, Williams (1976) found in the slime
mold Dictyostelium discoideum that the frequency of spontaneous mutation to
the recessive state at a single locus was only an order of magnitude greater in
diploids relative to that in haploids.
Indeed, plant cell cultures have been used to successfully isolate biochemical
mutants. A discussion of some of these mutants can be found in Chaleff and
Carlson (1974, 1975), Widholm (1974b), and Zenk (1974). The only report
50
W.R. SCOWCROFT
dealing with the recovery of auxotrophic mutants is that of Carlson (1970). In
this study he utilized the lethality to growing cells of the incorporation of
5-bromodeoxyuridine as an enrichment procedure for nongrowing auxotrophic
mutants. By this procedure Carlson was able to isolate tobacco cell clones which
required amino acids, vitamins, or a nucleic acid for growth. These mutants were
leaky in that they continued to grow, albeit slowly, on unsupplemented
medium. This may have been due to multiple gene copies, for although Carlson
(1970) used callus cultures derived from haploids, such haploids do in fact
contain two genomes because tobacco is an amphidiploid. It is also possible that
plants have alternate biosynthetic pathways.
By far the greatest success in isolating biochemical mutants has resulted from
selecting mutants resistant to antimetabolites. When nitrate is the sole source of
nitrogen for tobacco cells, the inclusion of L-threonine in the medium inhibits
cell growth, presumably by blocking the nitrate assimilation pathway (Heimer
and Filner, 1970). Under such conditions Heimer and Filner were able to recover
a ceIl line which was resistant to the growth inhibitory effects of threonine. The
resistance was due to a mutant in the nitrate uptake pathway so that nitrate
could be assimilated in the presence of threonine.
Mutant cell lines have also been reported which are resistant to the base
analogues 5-bromodeoxyuridine (Maliga et aZ., 1973a) and 8-azaguanine
(Lescure, 1973; Bright and Northcote, 1975). The BUdR-resistant mutant is
controlled by a simple Mendelian gene (Marton and Maliga, 1975). Bright and
Northcote (1975) demonstrated that 8-azaguanine resistance resulted from a
decrease in hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl-transferase, so lessening the incorporation of the base analogue. Cell lines resistant to the drug streptomycin have been
found in Petunia (Binding et aZ., 1970) and tobacco (Maliga et aZ., 1973b). The
streptomycin resistance was maternally inherited, and since streptomycin affects
the greening of plant tissue it is likely that the mutation occurred in the
chloroplasts. It is likely that the chloroplast ribosomes were affected, since
streptomycin resistance in bacteria is associated with 70s ribosomes and chloroplast ribosomes are similar to those of bacteria.
A. AMINO ACID ANALOGUE-RESISTANT MUTANTS
Mutants resistant to amino acid analogues are the most thoroughly studied
recent biochemical mutants (Widholm, 1974b). Amino acid analogues inhibit the
growth of plant cells for several reasons, but the main thrust has been with those
that may act as false-feedback inhibitors, i.e., they mimic the natural amino acid
in inhibiting one of the enzymes in the biosynthetic pathway. Widholm (1971)
obtained circumstantial evidence that tryptophan biosynthesis in cell cultures of
several plant species was regulated by feedback inhibition of anthranilate syn-
SOMATIC CELL GENETICS AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT
51
thetase. With the tryptophan analogue, 5methyltryptophan, mutants were
selected in tobacco (Widholm, 1972a) and carrot (Widholm, 1972b) which were
resistant to growth inhibitory concentrations of the analogue. All of the mutants
had an altered anthranilate synthetase. Inhibition studies on cell extracts indicated that the enzyme was not inhibited by the analogue, nor indeed by
tryptophan, to the same extent as was the enzyme of nonmutant cell cultures.
Moreover, an expectation was fulfilled, namely that mutants which lacked
feedback regulation would overproduce the specific amino acid. The mutant
carrot and tobacco lines had free tryptophan levels 27- and 10-fold higher than
normal, respectively. Subsequently, Widholm (1974a) selected an additional
5-methyltryptophan resistant mutant carrot cell line in which the mechanism
was due to decreased uptake of the analogue. In this mutant the free tryptophan
level was also elevated but the mechanism of how this occurred is unknown.
Mutants have also been isolated in carrot and tobacco which are resistant to
the phenylalanine analogue, p-fluorophenylalanine (Palmer and Widholm, 1975).
The analogue is normally toxic because it is incorporated into protein. The basis
for the resistance in the mutants was probably due to decreased incorporation
into protein as a result of increased cellular levels of phenylalanine in the carrot
mutant, and also presumably for the tobacco mutant, where it appears that the
increased phenylalanine was converted to phenolic compounds. The enzyme
chorismate mutase from the mutant tobacco cells had reduced sensitivity to
inhibition by phenylalanine or its analogue. In the carrot mutant, chorismate
mutase was unchanged. The basis for the resistance in the carrot mutant is
unknown.
A preliminary report (Chaleff and Carlson, 1975) has also indicated that the
lysine analogue, S-(P-aminoethyl)-cysteine, which inhibits the growth of rice
cells, can be used to select resistant rice cell cultures which have elevated levels
of lysine, both in the free amino acid pool and in total amino acids. The levels of
other amino acids are also elevated in these mutants. The mechanism of resistance and the basis for the increased synthesis of lysine and other amino acids
have not been determined. It would also be of considerable value t o know the
lysine content of the grain of plants regenerated from lysine analogue-resistant
lines.
The isolation of mutants which have elevated levels of certain amino acids is of
interest and of possible value to plant improvement because the grains of most
crops are deficient in certain amino acids important to human and monogastric
nutrition. The limiting amino acid in all cereals is lysine, and maize is also
deficient in tryptophan, and wheat and rice are deficient in threonine. Legume
grains tend to be deficient in methionine. The principal mechanism which
regulates amino acid pools in plants is feedback inhibition, and indeed this has
been confirmed by some mutant cell cultures reported previously. Brock et al.
(1973) discuss the principles of feedback inhibition in relation to obtaining
52
W. R. SCOWCROFT
mutants which overproduce lysine. They suggest that the feedback receptor site,
presumably on the enzyme aspartokinase, can be inactivated by mutation so that
the enzyme is no longer sensitive to feedback inhibition. Such mutants could be
selected in the presence of the lysine analogue S-(0-aminoethy1)-cysteine which
normally inhibits growth because it mimics lysine in inhibiting the activity of
aspartokinase. The cell culture mutants of Charleff and Carlson (1975) tend to
support the expectation of Brock et al. (1973). Increasing the level of lysine in
the free amino acid pool is of course only the first step. Ideally it is the lysine in
the grain storage protein that needs to be increased. The assembly of amino acids
into proteins, both catalytically active and storage proteins, is a complex process
involving messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) synthesis, the coupling of amino
acids to transfer RNAs (tRNAs), polypeptide chain initiation, elongation, and
termination. As has been pointed out by Brock and Langridge (1975), genetic
alterations in the amino acid specificity of tRNAs, which has been done in
prokaryotes, could alter the amino acid composition of storage proteins.
B. DISEASE-RESISTANT MUTANTS
The susceptibility of agronomic crops to pathogenic diseases is probably still
the major constraint on maximizing yield. The battle against crop pathogens is a
continuing one, since pathogenic variants arise by genetic events which render
previously resistant crop varieties susceptible. Many bacteria are pathogenic
because they secrete toxin lethal to plant cells. The ability t o screen large
numbers of plant cells in culture provides a means whereby direct selection for
clones resistant to the bacterial toxin could yield resistant genotypes. Mutant
clones have been isolated from tobacco cultures which when regenerated into
plants have increased resistance to the pathogen Pseudomonas tabaci which
causes wildfire disease (Carlson, 1973). The resistance of these plants is not as
complete as that in naturally resistant varieties. Methionine sulfoximine was used
as the antimetabolite to select the resistant cell clones because it would elicit the
same chlorotic response in tobacco as did the bacterial toxin. The relationship
between methionine sulfoximine and wildfire toxin is not precisely clear but in
bacteria the former interferes with the activity of glutamine synthetase
(Brenchley, 1973) and the bacterial toxin is considered to inhibit glutamine
synthetase in plants (Sinden and Durbin, 1968). Glutamine synthetase has been
shown to be extremely important in cellular metabolism in bacteria (Magasanik
et al., 1974), and the same is probable for plants. It is unfortunate that Carlson
(1973) did not compare the enzymatic characteristics of the glutamine synthetase in the mutant clones with that in susceptible cells.
In 1969, 1970, and 1971 there was an epidemic of southern corn leaf blight
(Helminthosponum maydis) because a new pathogenic race arose which attacked
SOMATIC CELL GENETICS AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT
53
maize hybrids and inbreds which carried the widely used “Texas” (T) source of
male sterile cytoplasm. It has been established that susceptibility t o this pathogenic race was due to a toxin which binds to the mitochondrial membranes of
susceptible lines, leading to the uncoupling and inhibition of mitochondrid
electron transport (Peterson et al., 1975). Gegenbach and Green (1975) found
that the growth of cell cultures derived from maize with T cytoplasm was
mhibited by the toxin, whereas the growth of normal cytoplasm cultures was
not. Subsequently, they selected a cell clone from the T cytoplasm cultures
which was resistant to growth inhibitory concentrations of the toxin. The
mitochondria of this resistant clone were no longer sensitive t o the toxin.
Resistance was retained when cultures were grown in the absence of the toxin
suggesting that the basis of resistance was genetic. Since plants have not been
regenerated from this toxin-resistant clone it cannot be established whether the
genetic change was nuclear or mitochondrial or whether the cytoplasm was
similar t o the parent in respect to male sterility.
For any plant disease in which pathogenicity is associated with a toxin, it is
relatively inexpensive to treat cell cultures of susceptible, but otherwise desirable, varieties to obtain resistant clones. This would provide an assessment of
the chance of recovering resistant mutants by directly exposing the plant
population to the toxin. Moreover, if the resistant clones could be regenerated to
produce fertile plants, and provided the plant and field resistance correlated well
with resistance in cell culture, then plant breeders may have a way of hastening
the development of new disease-resistant varieties. The use of tissue culture in
this way could provide an alternative t o the expensive and time-consuming
conventional method of transferring disease resistance into susceptible but
otherwise highly regarded varieties.
C. STRESS-RESISTANT AND OTHER MUTANTS
Plant improvement depends primarily on the evaluation of a phenotype and
this of course is a function of many different genetic and biochemical components. However, there is a reductionist approach in biochemistry, plant
physiology, and genetics which attempts to provide an elemental description of
plant processes in biochemical and genetic terms. As this is achieved, plant tissue
culture can be utilized to develop genotypes which have genetic alterations
affecting a specific biochemical function.
Salinity, particularly in irrigated areas, is a major restriction on realizing yield
potential. Also there is an immense crop potential if saline water, and indeed
seawater, could be used without the expensive process of desalination. There is a
need for salt-tolerant agricultural varieties and this may be achieved by selection
since there is a genetic basis to salt tolerance (Dewey, 1960; Abel, 1969; Rush
54
W. R. SCOWCROFT
and Epstein, 1976). However, where natural genetic variability is absent, tissue
culture may provide a solution. It would appear that salt-tolerant clones can be
rapidly isolated from plant cell cultures (Nabors et al., 1975; Dix and Street,
1975). These cultures can withstand 4-5 times the salt concentration that
inhibits growth of normal cells. Again, the evidence to judge whether plants
regenerated from such tolerant clones are also tolerant to high salt concentrations has not yet been provided. Since internal ion concentration is regulated by
cellular restriction of ion uptake, or by excretion of adsorbed ion, it is likely
that there would be a high correlation between cellular and plant salt tolerance.
Crops are often subjected to flooding and it has been postulated that the
injury results from the accumulation of alcohol as a consequence of anaerobic
respiration in the roots (McManmon and Crawford, 1971). Under anaerobic
conditions alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) catalyzes the reduction of acetaldehyde to alcohol. There are electrophoretic variants of ADH and the “fast”
varient apparently is catalytically more active than the “slow” variant (Felder
and Scandalios, 1971). Marshall et al. (1973) have shown that maize plants
which carry the presumptive catalytically less active form of ADH are more
tolerant to flooding. It can be argued that plants deficient for ADH might be
even more tolerant to flooding conditions. Indeed a selection system exists for
such ADH-deficient genotypes. M y 1 alcohol is converted to the highly toxic
acrylaldehyde by ADH (Megnet, 1967), and Schwartz and Osterman (1976) have
utilized allyl alcohol as a pollen selection system in maize. Our own research has
shown that plant cells are very sensitive to low concentrations of allyl alcohol.
We are currently attempting to select allyl alcohol-resistant clones which we
predict will be deficient for ADH. This selection system also has the added
advantage that ADH can be contraselected, namely, that ADH-mutants will be
sensitive to exogenous acetaldehyde which is toxic to plant cells unless metabolized. Using tissue culture cells this selection system may provide a precise
genetic means of increasing plant tolerance to flooding.
There is no doubt that mutants which are altered in some specific biochemical
function can be isolated from cell culture. As has been the case with microorganisms, this will greatly increase the understanding of biochemical processes
in plants. The degree to which genetic alterations at the cellular level correlate
with altered metabolism in whole plants is as yet largely unknown. The direct
value of somatic cell mutants in plant improvement will depend on the extent of
t h ~ scorrelation. However, other aspects of genetic manipulation at the cellular
level, e.g., somatic hybridization, do require biochemical mutants to provide
efficient hybrid selection systems.
Although the studies are not specifically related to plant improvement, plant
tissue culture is also being evaluated for the production of physiologically active
substances, particularly those of medical importance such as steroids and cardiac
glycosides (Misawa et al., 1974; Reinhard, 1974). Microorganisms have been
SOMATIC CELL GENETICS AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT
55
used extensively for the biosynthesis of commercially valuable metabolites and
the efficiency of such biotransformation has been increased by the use of
mutants having altered biosynthetic functions. If plant cell cultures prove to be
useful for the production of medically important compounds, then assuredly
mutants will be selected which yield greater quantities of such compounds.
V.
Plant Cell Protoplasts
A. METHODOLOGY OF ISOLATION
For the purposes of this discussion a protoplast refers t o a cell from which
the cell wall has been removed by mechanical or enzymatic methods. It has been
possible to isolate protoplasts from plants by mechanical methods, but the yield
and quality of the protoplasts is generally low. In 1960 Cocking used a crude
enzyme preparation of the fungus Myrothecium yemearia to isolate protoplasts
from tomato roots. Since that time, and particularly as a result of the commercial availability of cell wall degrading enzyme complexes (Gamborg and
Wetter, 1975), protoplast technology has developed enormously. Several recent
reviews examine various aspects of the isolation, culture, and current and
proposed uses of plant protoplasts (Cocking, 1972; Tempe, 1973; Eriksson et al.,
1974; Gamborg and Wetter, 1975; Vasil, 1976; Gamborg, 1976). Therefore it is
not intended to go into specific details or to cite from the extensive literature
which is largely covered by these reviews. Only recent and key references will be
cited.
Protoplasts can be isolated from virtually any plant structure that is not
lignified, including leaves, petals, and microsporocytes, and also from plant cell
cultures. Leaves have been used extensively for such isolation. To expose the
mesophyll cells to the enzyme preparations the epidermis can be physically
removed or injured by the use of carborundum (Beier and Bruening, 1975), or
leaves can be gently macerated. Enzymatic digestion can be by a sequential
process, where mesophyll cells are first released by the action of crude pectinase
and the cell walls then degraded by cellulase (Nagata and Takebe, 1970), or by
the more common, single-step procedure using an enzyme mixture containing
pectinase and cellulase. Since protoplasts are subject to osmotic damage and
rupture, an osmotic stabilizer such as mannitol, sorbitol, glucose, or sucrose is
required in the culture medium. Factors which affect the quality, quantity, and
osmotic stability of isolated protoplasts include the immediate environmental
and nutritional history and age of the plants (Shepard and Totten, 1975). Cell
suspension cultures are proving extremely valuable for the isolation of protoplasts because of the greater control over the physiological state of the cells and
the sterility of the starting material. Cells in early to mid-log phase of growth
56
W. R. SCOWCROFT
appear to be in the most favorable state for protoplast isolation (Uchimiya and
Murashige, 1974).
Crude enzyme preparations contain various impurities some of which are
probably toxic. While unpurified enzymes can be used with success, an improvement both in yield and in protoplast quality is obtained if the enzyme mixture is
cleansed of low molecular weight impurities by passage through a Sephadex
G-25 column (Schenk and Hildebrandt, 1969). In our laboratory we have found
a substantial improvement in protoplast viability by merely dialyzing the cell
wall degrading enzyme mixture overnight in the cold against several changes of
distilled water. This appears to remove phenolics, salts, and other low molecular
weight impurities. Protoplast preparations have varying degrees of cellular and
subcellular debris. Several methods involving repeated sedimentation and resuspension or two-phase liquid partitioning have been used with varying success. We
have confirmed a recent report by Larkin (1976) that commercial density
buffers containing sodium metrizoate and Ficoll (Lymphoprep, Nyegaard A/S
Oslo, Norway; Ficoll-Paque, Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) are excellent for
removing debris.
Protoplasts as experimental systems per se have already found widespread use
in studying virus infection and multiplication (Takebe, 1 9 7 9 , cell organelles and
vacuoles (Wagner and Siegelman, 1975), photosynthesis (Nishimura and
Akazawa, 1975), the cellular response to toxins from pathogens (Pelcher et al.,
1975; Strobel, 1975), and cell wall biosynthesis and deposition (Fowke et al.,
1974; Willison and Cocking, 1975).
B. PROTOPLAST CULTURE
Protoplasts are significant to both fundamental and applied genetic research
because at least some species can be induced to form a cell wall, divide, and
undergo regeneration into plants. This means that genetic modifications that
are facilitated using protoplasts may possibly be evaluated in mature plants.
Protoplasts can be cultured by embedding in agar medium or suspending in
liquid, either as large-volume (25-50 ml) or dropsuspension (about 100 pliters)
cultures or as suspensions on agar. The nutritional requirements of cultured
protoplasts are similar to those for culturing plant cells but with the addition of osmotic stabilizers (mannitol, sorbitol) and possibly antibiotics (Watts
and King, 1973) if bacterial and fungal infection is a problem. The general
references previously cited examine the various aspects of the culture and
regeneration of protoplasts. Recently, Uchimiya and Murashige (1 976) have
systematically examined the nutritional requirements for the recovery of
dividing cells from tobacco protoplasts. They found that while growth regulators
are not essential for cell wall regeneration, an exogenous auxin is required for
SOMATIC CELL GENETICS AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT
57
cell division and a lower than normal sucrose concentration (1.5%) seems
optimal. Protoplasts have been successfully cultured in a range of media containing widely varying total salt concentrations (Gamborg, 1976). Uchimiya and
Murashige (1976) found Murashige and Skoog’s (1962) basic salts most successful, although they do point out that a systematic approach t o the nutritional
requirements for successful protoplast regeneration for a chosen species is most
desirable.
The time course of cell wall formation and cell division is variable and is
treated in detail by Vasil(1976), Willison and Cocking (1975), and Williamson et
al. (cited in Gamborg, 1976). The deposition of microfibrils on the plasmalemma
membrane begins immediately after removal of the cell wall degrading enzymes,
and wall formation can be observed macroscopically, using fluorescent brighteners (Calcofluor), usually within 48 hours. Cell division proceeds thereafter and
according to Uchimiya and Murashige (1976), 30% of the protoplasts had
r e - f m e d into dividing cells within 5-6 days. The general case is that cell wall
formation precedes cell division, but according to Meyer and Abel (1975)
division in tobacco protoplasts can occur without rigid cell wall formation. The
precise relationship between nuclear division and cytokinesis in plant cells is not
known, but at least in Chlamydomonas rheinhardtii, mutants without cell W ~
have been recovered (Hyams and Davies, 1972). A similar mutant in plant cells
would be extremely useful particularly if it were a conditional (temperaturesensitive) lesion, whlch under certain conditions could regenerate a cell wall. A
mutant clone with a genetic lesion affecting cell wall formation should be
relatively easy to select because such a clone would tend to disaggregate in
culture. Of course such a mutant might be effectively lethal if cell wall formation is an absolute prerequisite for cell division.
The number of species for which plants have been regenerated from protoplasts more or less parallels regeneration studies with normal tissue culture cells.
Vasil (1976) and Gamborg (1976) provide lists (and appropriate references) of
such species, which include tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), rapeseed (Brassica
napus), asparagus (Asparagus officinalis), carrot (Daucus carota), petunia
(Petunia hybrida and P. parodii), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), bromegrass
(Bromus inermis), Datura innoxia, Ranunculus scleratus, A tropa belladona, and
orange (Citrus sinensis). The development of callus from isolated protoplasts has
been observed in an additional twenty-odd plant species including soybean
(Glycine m a ) , cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), pea (Pisum sativa), sugarcane
(Sacchaium sp.), and flax (Linum usitatissimum). Even at this level not one of
the major cereal crops is represented. While this list of species might seem
impressive, considering that the technology to isolate and culture plant protoplasts has been available for less than a decade, it is unfortunate that no success
has been achieved with the cereals and only limited success with the legumes.
However, this has not been through a lack of application of protoplast tech-
S
58
W. R. SCOWCROFT
niques to cereal and legume species. The recalcitrant nature of these species at
the protoplast level is a reflection of the difficulties experienced in normal tissue
culture studies.
Apart from the earlier mentioned uses of protoplasts (Section V, A), as
potential cell and plant regeneration systems, protoplasts could facilitate the
genetic modification of plant species. There are two broad areas where this
might apply. First, they provide a physically amenable system for the uptake of
large particles and macromolecules such as DNA, aspects of studies of which will
be considered later (Section VI, C). Second, since the rigid cell wall is removed
protoplasts can fuse.
C. PROTOPLAST FUSION AND SOMATIC HYBRIDIZATION
This topic has been recently and extensively reviewed (Cocking, 1975;
Melchers et al., 1975; Vasil, 1976;Gamborg, 1977), and only the broad outlines
and recent developments will be presented here. Protoplast fusion does occur
spontaneously and this appears to be a consequence of the isolation procedure
rather than a result of contact between isolated protoplasts. Fusion between
isolated protoplasts can be induced using NaN03, Ca2+ at high pH, and polyethylene glycol (PEG). A comparative evaluation of these methods indicates that
PEG-induced fusion is the most effective and reproducible method (Burgess and
Fleming, 1974). At a concentration of 20-30% PEG, immediate and extensive
protoplast aggregation occurs whch is enhanced by Ca2+enrichment. Fusion is a
consequence of the removal of PEG. The relative importance of Ca” in protoplast fusion is also a feature of animal cell fusion, where it has been found that
agents which increase the cytoplasmic concentration of Ca2+, e.g., cation ionophores, may enhance fusion (Ahkong et al., 1975).
Following protoplast fusion the heterokaryon may form a cell wall and
proceed to divide to form callus. Gamborg and co-workers (Gamborg, 1977)
have observed division of heterokaryocytes resulting from the fusion of protoplasts obtained from the leaf mesophyll of several species, on the one hand, with
protoplasts from cell cultures, primarily soybean, on the other. Nuclear fusion
has also been observed in heterokaryocytes of pea and soybean (Constabel et al.,
1975a) and carrot and barley (Dudits et al., 1976).
For plant improvement, the real value of somatic hybridization lies in the
capacity t o transfer genetic information from one species to another. There are
now a number of instances where hybrid plants have been recovered following
somatic hybridization by protoplast fusion. In each case the recovery of hybrid
cell clones depended on the use of a selection system which favored the growth
of the hybrid cell. Carlson et al. (1972) recovered a somatic hybrid between two
species of tobacco, Nicotiana glauca and N langsdorfii. These two species will
SOMATIC CELL GENETICS AND PLANT IMPROVEMENT
59
hybridize sexually, and cells of the tumorous hybrid grow on a media devoid of
growth regulators; neither of the two parents grows on such media. T h s
provided the basis of Carlson’s selection system and, following the induction of
fusion, a number of presumptive somatic hybrid calluses were recovered of
which three were analyzed in detail. On morphological, electrophoretic, and
chromosome number grounds the somatic hybrid was similar to the sexual
hybrid. Fraction I protein analysis of the somatic hybrid revealed that the
nuclear-coded small subunits of both parents were present but only the chloroplast-coded large subunit polypeptides of N. glauca (Kung et d., 1975).
Carlson’s results have recently been confirmed (Smith et d , 1976) and 23
mature hybrid plants, representing 19 independent fusion events, have been
regenerated following PEG-induced protoplast fusion and selection on growthregulator-free medium. Plants from at least 14 of these 19 events were fertile,
and corolla, leaf, and plant habit were characteristic of, but somewhat different
from, the sexual hybrid. Cytological examination of the 23 hybrid plants
revealed a somatic chromosome number of 56-64, which differs from that of
Carlson et QZ. (1972) who found a somatic number of 42, which is the chromosome number of the sexual amphiploid representing the 24 from Nicotiana
glauca plus 18 from N . lungsdorffi.Smith et QZ. (1 976) explained their results by
assuming that successful hybrids resulted from triple fusions with subsequent
chromosome loss, which indeed they observed in hybrid plants regenerated from
a hybrid callus at different times.
Melchers and Labib (1974) recovered somatic hybrids following fusion of
protoplasts from two mutant lines of Nicotiana tQbQCUm.These mutant lines
carry nonallelic nuclear mutations which affect chlorophyll formation and grow
very slowly in strong light. The F1 hybrid between them is normal. Twenty
independent hybrids were obtained, and genetic segregation of the two nonallelic mutations in the F2 of the somatic hybrid was similar to that of the
sexual hybrid. A similar, although less elegant system, has been used by Gleba et
d. (1975) to recover presumptive somatic hybrids also in N. tabacum.
Somatic hybrids have also been obtained following fusion of protoplasts from
two closely related, sexually compatible species of Petunia (Power et aL, 1976).
Hybrid callus was isolated by a selection procedure based on naturally occurring
differences between the two species, P. parodii and P. hybrids. On a particular
medium P. parodii protoplasts, at best, only produced small (50-cell) colonies
and then ceased to grow, whle P. hybrids protoplasts produced viable callus.
The complementary part of the selection system was based on the greater
sensitivity of P. hybrids protoplasts to actinomycin D. Plants regenerated from
selected “hybrid” callus had the expected chromosome number range of 24-28,
and flower color and morphology were identical to the sexual hybrid which was
distinguishable from either parent. Peroxidase isoenzyme banding patterns differed between the two species. The isoenzyme patterns of the sexual and