Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (13.17 MB, 1,696 trang )
6.2
CHAPTER Six
reactive gases for water stabilization and disinfection, precipitation of inorganic contaminants, and air stripping of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nuisance-causing dissolved gases. The diffused aeration (or bubble) systems are primarily used for the absorption
of reactive gases such as oxygen (O2), ozone (O3), and chlorine (Cl2). For example, ozone is
used for disinfection, oxidation of VOCs and pesticides, taste and odor control, disinfection
by-products control, as a coagulant aid, and for some other uses. Chlorine is primarily used
for disinfection and sometimes as a preoxidant for the oxidation of iron and manganese and
for other purposes. Diffused aeration systems have also been used for stripping of odorcausing compounds and VOCs. Surface aeration systems are primarily used for removal
of gases and VOCs. The packed tower and spray nozzle systems are primarily used for the
removal of NH3, CO2, H2S, and VOCs. The packed tower systems include countercurrent
flow, cocurrent flow, and cross-flow configurations. Spray nozzle systems include tower
and fountain-type configurations.
Another application is the dissolution of air into recycled water under pressure in packed
towers called saturators and subsequent production of air bubbles when the pressurized
recycle water is injected into an open tank for water clarification. This application is called
dissolved air flotation and is covered in Chap. 9.
A fundamental understanding of the theory of gas transfer is first discussed, followed
by a description of the various unit operations, development of the governing equations,
and example design calculations.
THEORY OF GAS TRANSFER
Proper design and operation of aeration and air stripping devices require a fundamental
understanding of equilibrium partitioning of chemicals between air and water as well as an
understanding of the mass transfer rate across the air-water interface is required. Equilibrium
is the final state that the system is moving towards. The displacement of the system from
equilibrium dictates how much fluid (air) is required for stripping or aeration and defines
the driving force that governs mass transfer, i.e., the rate at which chemicals move from one
phase to another, which in turn determines the vessel size required for stripping or aeration.
Both equilibrium and mass transfer concepts are incorporated into mass balance equations to
formulate the governing equations. Consequently, these concepts are reviewed first.
Equilibrium
Component A
water vapor
air
A(air)
A(aq)
Component A
water
Figure 6-1 Schematic of
equilibrium conditions for component A in air and water.
For most aeration and air stripping applications in water treatment, equilibrium partitioning of a gas or organic contaminant between air and water can be described by Henry’s law.
The Henry’s law equilibrium description can be derived by
considering the closed vessel shown in Fig. 6-1. If the vessel
contains both water and air and component A is in equilibrium with both phases at a constant temperature, equilibrium
can be described by the following expression:
K eq =
aair
aaq
(6-1)
where Keq is the equilibrium constant, aair is the activity of
component A in the gas phase, and aaq is the activity of component A in the aqueous phase.
GAS–LIQUID PROCESSES: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS
6.3
At a pressure of 1 atm, the gas behaves ideally, and Eq. 6-1 reduces to:
H = K eq =
PA
gA A
(6-2)
where H is the Henry’s law constant (atm-L/mole) of component A, PA is the pressure A
exerts in the gas phase (atm), gA is the activity coefficient of A in the aqueous phase, and A
is the aqueous-phase molar concentration of A (mole/L).
The presence of air does not affect the Henry’s law constant for organic chemicals or
gases. For low ionic strength, Henry’s law may be written as follows:
PA = H [ A]
(6-3)
When other dissolved organic and inorganic species are present at concentrations less than
0.01 mole/L, the equilibrium partitioning according to Eq. 6-3 is not affected and is generally valid. Further, it has been shown in some cases to be valid for concentrations as high
as 0.1 mole/L (Rogers, 1994). The units of H in Eq. 6-3 are atm-L/mole, but H has other
units. Figure 6-2 displays the three most commonly used unit measures of H. H is reported
in units of atm when the gas-phase concentration of component A is expressed in atm and
the aqueous-phase concentration of component A is expressed in terms of mole fraction. H
is reported in units of liters of water times atm per mole of gas (L ⋅ atm/mole) when the gasphase concentration of component A is expressed in atm and the aqueous-phase concentration of component A is expressed in terms moles of component A per liter of water. H is
also reported in dimensionless units when both the gas and aqueous phases are expressed in
the same concentration units. Because the reported units of H vary, it is necessary to convert
from one system of units to another. Table 6-1 displays various unit conversions that can
be used to perform this conversion. Dimensionless units are convenient for mass balances;
consequently, dimensionless units are preferred and are used in this chapter.
Estimating Henry’s Constant. When the Henry’s law constant for a component of interest
is not readily available, it can be estimated if the component’s vapor pressure and aqueous
solubility are known. There are two situations in which it is possible to estimate the Henry’s
constant of component A: (1) when component A is perfectly miscible in the aqueous phase
and (2) when component A is immiscible in the aqueous phase. When component A is
perfectly miscible and the mole fraction of A is equal to 1 ( x H2O = 0), the pressure exerted
by A is equal to the vapor pressure of pure A at a given temperature. In this case H, can be
expressed as:
H = Pv , A
(6-4)
in which Pv , A is the vapor pressure of pure component A at a given temperature (atm).
When component A is immiscible in the aqueous phase, a third or separate phase of
component A is formed within the aqueous phase once the solubility of A is exceeded.
If this third phase contains water, then H cannot be determined from vapor pressure and
solubility data because the partitioning in the third phase is unknown. However, if the third
phase contains only pure component A, then the following expression can be used:
H=
Pv , A
Cs , A
(6-5)
in which Cs , A is the aqueous solubility of component A (mg/L). Equations 6-4 and 6-5
are estimation techniques that give H values within ±50 to 100 percent of experimentally
reported values and should therefore only be used when measured values of the constants
are not available.
6.4
CHAPTER Six
(a)
H (atm)
PA
moles A
XA moles A + moles H O
2
(b)
PA
(atm)
H (L-atm/mol)
CA
mol
L
(c)
YA
M
LAir
H
CA
L H 2O
LAir
M
LH 2O
Figure 6-2 (a) plot of H displayed in atm, (b) plot of H displayed
in liters of water ⋅ atm/mol, (c) plot of H displayed in liters of water
per liter of air.
GAS–LIQUID PROCESSES: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS
6.5
Table 6-1 Unit Conversions for
Henry’s Law Constants
H (LH2 O / LAir ) =
⋅atm
H (Lmol )
RT
L ⋅ atm
H
= H ( LH2 O / LAir ) × RT
mol
H (atm )
H ( LH2 O / LAir ) =
2
RT × 55 . 6 mol HOO
L H2
L ⋅ atm
H (atm)
H
=
mol H 2 O
mol 55 . 6 L H2 O
⋅atm
2
H (atm ) = H (Lmol ) × 55 . 6 mol HOO
L H2
2
H (atm ) = H (L H2 O /L Air ) × RT × 55 . 6 mol HOO
L H2
atm L
R = 0 . 08205 mol ⋅°K
T =K
Effects of Temperature and Solution Properties. Temperature, pressure, ionic strength,
surfactants, and solution pH (for ionizable species such as NH3 and CO2) can influence the
equilibrium partitioning between air and water.
Pressure. The impact of total system pressure on H is negligible because most aeration and stripping devices operate at atmospheric pressure.
Temperature. For the range of temperatures encountered in water treatment, H tends
to increase with increasing temperature because the aqueous solubility of the component
decreases while its vapor pressure increases. Values of H for several organic compounds at
different temperatures are given in Table 6-2. Table 6-3 displays H values for gases at 20°C.
Assuming the standard enthalpy change (∆H°) for the dissolution of a component in water
is constant over the temperature range of interest, the change in H with temperature can be
estimated using the following van’t Hoff-type equation:
−∆ H o 1 1
H 2 = H1 × exp
R T − T
2 1
(6-6)
in which ∆H° is the standard enthalpy change in water due to the dissolution of a component in water (kcal/kmol), R is the universal gas constant (1.987 kcal/kmol-K), H1 is a
known value of Henry’s constant at temperature T1 (K), H2 is the calculated Henry’s law
constant at the desired temperature T2 (K), and C is a constant.
Equation 6-6 can be simplified to Eq. 6-7, and values of ∆H° and C for selected compounds are summarized in Table 6-4.
∆H o
H = C × exp −
RT
(6-7)
Another common method of expressing the temperature dependence of H is to treat
∆H°, R, and C as fitting parameters A and B using the following equation:
B
H = exp A −
T
(6-8)
Table 6-5 lists values of A and B for several compounds. These are valid for temperatures ranging from 283 to 303 K (Ashworth et al., 1988).
Table 6-2 Henry’s Law Constants in atm m3/mole and the H Values in Liters of Water per Liter of Air Are Given in Parentheses for 45 Organic Compounds
(Ashworth et al., 1988).
Henry’s law constants, H
Component
6.6
Nonane
n-Hexane
2-Methylpentane
Cyclohexane
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
o-Xylene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
Propylbenzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Benzene
Methyl ethylbenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
10°C
0.400 (17.2)
0.238 (10.3)
0.697 (30.0)
0.103 (4.44)
0.00244 (0.105)
0.00163 (0.0702)
0.00221 (0.0952)
0.00212 (0.0913)
0.00285 (0.123)
0.00420 (0.181)
0.00411 (0.177)
0.00568 (0.245)
0.00326 (0.140)
0.00381 (0.164)
0.00330 (0.142)
0.00351 (0.151)
0.00368 (0.158)
0.00117 (0.0504)
0.00965 (0.416)
0.000390 (0.0168)
0.00270 (0.116)
0.000590 (0.0254)
0.00846 (0.364)
15°C
0.496 (21.0)
0.413 (17.5)
0.694 (29.4)
0.126 (5.33)
0.00281 (0.119)
0.00143 (0.0605)
0.00231 (0.0978)
0.00217 (0.0918)
0.00361 (0.153)
0.00483 (0.204)
0.00496 (0.210)
0.00731 (0.309)
0.00451 (0.191)
0.00492 (0.210)
0.00388 (0.164)
0.00420 (0.178)
0.00454 (0.192)
0.00130 (0.0550)
0.0115 (0.487)
0.000630 (0.0267)
0.00326 (0.138)
0.00705 (0.298)
0.0111 (0.467)
20°C
0.332 (13.8)
0.883 (36.7)
0.633 (26.3)
0.140 (5.82)
0.00341 (0.142)
0.00168 (0.0699)
0.00294 (0.122)
0.00259 (0.108)
0.00474 (0.197)
0.00645 (0.268)
0.00598 (0.249)
0.00881 (0.366)
0.00601 (0.250)
0.00555 (0.231)
0.00452 (0.188)
0.00503 (0.209)
0.00563 (0.234)
0.00147 (0.0612)
0.0146 (0.607)
0.000740 (0.0308)
0.00360 (0.150)
0.00857 (0.356)
0.0141 (0.587)
25°C
0.414 (16.9)
0.768 (31.4)
0.825 (33.7)
0.177 (7.24)
0.00360 (0.147)
0.00157 (0.0642)
0.00285 (0.117)
0.00317 (0.130)
0.00487 (0.199)
0.00744 (0.304)
0.00744 (0.304)
0.0108 (0.442)
0.00788 (0.322)
0.00642 (0.263)
0.00528 (0.216)
0.00558 (0.228)
0.00625 (0.256)
0.00141 (0.0577)
0.0174 (0.712)
0.000910 (0.0372)
0.00454 (0.186)
0.00945 (0.386)
0.0171 (0.699)
30°C
0.465 (18.7)
1.56 (62.7)
0.848 (34.1)
0.223 (8.97)
0.00473 (0.190)
0.00237 (0.0953)
0.00422 (0.170)
0.00389 (0.156)
0.00626 (0.252)
0.00945 (0.380)
0.00887 (0.357)
0.0137 (0.551)
0.0105 (0.422)
0.00808 (0.325)
0.00720 (0.290)
0.00770 (0.310)
0.00776 (0.312)
0.00174 (0.0700)
0.0211 (0.849)
0.00133 (0.0535)
0.00575 (0.231)
0.0121 (0.469)
0.0245 (0.985)
6.7
Trichloroethylene
Tetralin
Decalin
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Hexachloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Ethylene dibromide
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Methylene chloride
Chloroform
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4-Dimethylphenol
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl cellosolve
Methyl t-butyl ether*
Trichlorofluoromethane
*Fischer, Muller, and Klasmeier (2004).
0.00538 (0.237)
0.000750 (0.0323)
0.0700 (3.015)
0.0150 (0.646)
0.00759 (0.327)
0.00593 (0.255)
0.0148 (0.637)
0.00403 (0.174)
0.000300 (0.0129)
0.0154 (0.663)
0.00140 (0.0603)
0.00172 (0.0741)
0.000330 (0.0142)
0.00122 (0.0525)
0.000380 (0.0164)
0.00129 (0.0556)
0.00829 (0.357)
0.154 (6.63)
0.000280 (0.0121)
0.000660 (0.0284)
0.0441 (1.90)
0.5039 (0.0117)
0.0536 (2.31)
0.00667 (0.282)
0.00105 (0.0444)
0.0837 (3.54)
0.0168 (0.711)
0.00958 (0.405)
0.00559 (0.237)
0.0191 (0.808)
0.00460 (0.195)
0.000480 (0.0203)
0.203 (8.59)
0.00169 (0.0715)
0.00233 (0.986)
0.000200 (0.00846)
0.00126 (0.0533)
0.000450 (0.0190)
0.00105 (0.0444)
0.00674 (0.285)
0.215 (9.10)
0.000390 (0.0165)
0.000370 (0.0157)
0.0363 (1.54)
0.7490 (0.0177)
0.0680 (2.88)
0.00842 (0.350)
0.00136 (0.0566)
0.106 (4.41)
0.0217 (0.903)
0.0110 (0.458)
0.00591 (0.246)
0.0232 (0.965)
0.00571 (0.238)
0.000610 (0.0254)
0.0218 (0.907)
0.00244 (0.102)
0.00332 (0.138)
0.000730 (0.0304)
0.00190 (0.0790)
0.00103 (0.0428)
0.00183 (0.0761)
0.0101 (0.420)
0.245 (10.2)
0.000190 (0.00790)
0.000290 (0.0121)
0.116 (4.83)
0.9317 (0.0224)
0.0804 (3.34)
0.0102 (0.417)
0.00187 (0.0765)
0.117 (4.79)
0.0265 (1.08)
0.0121 (0.495)
0.00835 (0.342)
0.0295 (1.21)
0.00673 (0.275)
0.00065(00266)
0.0259 (1.06)
0.00296 (0.121)
0.00421 (0.172)
0.00025(0.0102)
0.00357 (0.146)
0.00118 (0.0483)
0.00192 (0.0785)
0.00493 (0.202)
0.319 (13.0)
0.00013(0.0053)
0.00039(0.0160)
0.0309 (1.26)
1.194 (0.0292)
0.101 (4.13)
0.0128 (0.515)
0.00268 (0108)
0.199 (8.00)
0.028 (1.13)
0.0143 (0.575)
0.0103 (0.414)
0.0378 (1.52)
0.00963 (0.387)
0.000800 (0.0322)
0.0318 (1.28)
0.00361 (0.145)
0.00554 (0.223)
0.000700 (0.0282)
0.00286 (0.115)
0.00152 (0.0611)
0.00297 (0.119)
0.00375 (0.151)
0.321 (12.9)
0.000110 (0.00443)
0.000680 (0.0274)
0.0381 (1.53)
1.557 (0.0387)
0.122 (4.91)
6.8
CHAPTER Six
Table 6-3 Henry’s Law
Constants at 20°C for Gases in Water
Compounds (Crittenden et al., 2005)
Compound
Table 6-4 Temperature Correction
Factors for H in atm (Crittenden et al.,
2005)
2
Ammonia
Carbon dioxide
Chlorine
Chlorine dioxide
Hydrogen sulfide
Methane
Oxygen
Ozone
Radon*
Sulfur dioxide
DH × 10–3
Compound
H, ( LH O / LAir )
Oxygen
Methane
Carbon dioxide
Hydrogen sulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Trichloroethylene
Benzene
Chloroform
Ozone
Ammonia
Sulfur dioxide
Chlorine
0.000574
0.114
0.442
0.0408
0.389
28.7
32.5
3.77
4.08
0.0287
*Clever (1980).
Table 6-5 Parameters for Calculating Henry’s Law Constants
(in atm m3/mole) as a Function of Temperature (Ashworth et al.,
1988)
Component
Nonane
n-Hexane
2-Methylpentane
Cyclohexane
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
o-Xylene
p-Xylene
m-Xylene
Propylbenzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Benzene
Methyl ethylbenzene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Tetralin
Decalin
Vinyl chloride
A
B
r2
–0.1847
25.25
2.959
9.141
3.469
–1.518
2.882
3.373
5.541
6.931
6.280
7.835
11.92
5.133
5.534
5.557
5.484
–1.371
7.351
9.320
5.164
5.333
10.65
7.845
11.83
11.85
6.138
202.1
7530
957.2
3238
2689
1422
2564
2720
3220
3520
3337
3681
4994
3024
3194
3179
3137
1522
3399
4843
3143
2964
4368
3702
5392
4125
2931
0.013
0.917
0.497
0.982
0.965
0.464
0.850
0.941
0.966
0.989
0.998
0.997
0.999
0.982
0.968
0.968
0.993
0.878
0.998
0.968
0.974
0.985
0.987
0.998
0.996
0.919
0.970
(Continued)
C
1.45
1.54
2.07
1.85
4.05
3.41
3.68
4.00
2.52
3.75
2.40
1.74
7.11
7.22
6.73
5.88
10.06
8.59
8.68
9.10
8.05
6.31
5.68
5.75
GAS–LIQUID PROCESSES: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS
6.9
Table 6-5 Parameters for Calculating Henry’s Law Constants
(in atm m3/mole) as a Function of Temperature (Ashworth et al.,
1988) (Continued)
Component
A
Chloroethane
4.265
Hexachloroethane
3.744
Carbon tetrachloride
9.739
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
7.241
Ethylene dibromide
5.703
1,1-Dichloroethylene
6.123
Methylene chloride
8.483
Chloroform
11.41
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.726
1,2-Dichloropropane
9.843
Dibromochloromethane
14.62
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
7.361
2,4-Dimethylphenol
–16.34
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane
9.649
Methyl ethyl ketone
–26.32
Methyl isobutyl ketone
–7.157
Methyl cellosolve
–6.050
Trichlorofluoromethane
9.480
B
2580
2550
3951
3628
3876
2907
4268
5030
2810
4708
6373
4028
–3307
3243
–5214
160.6
–873.8
3513
r2
0.984
0.768
0.997
0.962
0.928
0.974
0.988
0.997
0.194
0.820
0.914
0.819
0.555
0.932
0.797
0.002
0.023
0.998
Ionic Strength. In water supplies, gases or VOCs that are high in dissolved solids have
higher volatility (or have a higher apparent Henry’s law constant) than those with low dissolved solids. This results in a decrease in the solubility of the volatile component, i.e., a
“salting-out effect,” that can be represented mathematically as an increase in the activity
coefficient of component A, γA in aqueous solution. γA will increase (γA > 1) with increasing
ionic strength; this in turn causes the apparent Henry’s law constant, Happ, to be greater than
the thermodynamic value of H. The following equation can be used to calculate Happ:
P
H app = g A H = A
(6-9)
[ A]
in which γA is a function of ionic strength and can be calculated using the following empirical equation:
log10 g A = K s × I
(6-10)
where K s is the Setschenow, or “salting-out,” constant (L/mole) and I is the ionic strength
of the water (mole/L).
Ionic strength (I ), which is discussed in Chap. 3, is defined as follows:
I=
1
∑ (Ci Zi2 )
2 i
(6-11)
in which Ci is the molar concentration of ionic species i (mole/L) and Z i is the charge of
species i. The values of Ks need to be determined by experimental methods because there
is no general theory for predicting them. Table 6-6 displays the salting-out coefficients for
several compounds at 20°C. For most water supplies, the ionic strength is less than 10 mM
and the activity coefficient is equal to 1. Significant increases in volatility and the apparent
Henry’s constant are only observed for high ionic strength waters, such as seawater.
pH. pH does not affect the Henry’s constant per se but it does affect the distribution of
species between ionized and unionized forms. This, in turn, influences the overall gas-liquid
6.10
CHAPTER Six
Table 6-6 Setschenow or Salting-Out Coefficients, Ks at (20°C)
Compound
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Benzene
Toluene
Naphthalene
Ks (L · mol–1)
0.213
0.186
0.193
0.145
0.140
0.107
0.195
0.208
0.220
Reference
Gossett 1987
–
–
–
–
–
Schwarzenbach et al. 1992
–
–
distribution of the compound because only the unionized species are volatile. For example,
ammonia is present as ammonium ion at neutral pH and is not strippable. However, at high
pH (greater than 10), ammonia is not an ion and may be stripped. To predict the effect of
pH on solubility, one must consider the value of the appropriate acidity constant pKa. If
the acid is uncharged, such as HCN or H2S, and the pH is much less than the pKa (2 units
lower), then equilibrium partitioning can be described using the Henry’s law constant for
+
the uncharged species. If the acid is charged, such as NH4 , and the pH is much higher than
the pKa (2 units higher), then the compound will be volatile and its equilibrium partitioning
can be described using Henry’s law constant for the uncharged species. See Chap. 3 for a
presentation of acid-base chemistry.
Surfactants. Surfactants can also affect the volatility of compounds. Most natural waters
do not have high concentrations of surfactants; consequently, they do not affect the design of
most stripping devices. However, surfactants, if present, lower the volatility of compounds
by several mechanisms. The most important factor is that they tend to collect at the air-water
interface, diminishing the mole fraction of the compound at the interfacial area, thereby
lowering its apparent Henry’s law constant. In untreated wastewater, for example, the solubility of oxygen can be lowered by 30 to 50 percent due to the presence of surfactants.
Another effect for hydrophobic organics is the incorporation of the dissolved organics into
micelles in solution (this would occur only above the critical micelle concentration) that,
in turn, decreases the concentration of the organic compound at the air-water interface and
lowers the compound’s volatility (Vane and Giroux, 2000). O’Haver et al. (2004) provide a
more detailed discussion of the impact of surfactants on air stripping of VOCs.
Mass Transfer
The driving force for mass transfer between one phase and another derives from the displacement of the system from equilibrium. Figure 6-3 displays two situations where mass
transfer is occurring between the air and water. Figure 6-3a displays the situation where
mass is being transferred from the water to the air, and Fig. 6-3b displays the situation
where mass is being transferred from the air to the water. Because the mechanisms and
assumptions for mass transfer are essentially the same for both cases, a detailed explanation
of only one is warranted. Consider the case where a volatile contaminant is being stripped
from water to air (Fig. 6-3a). The contaminant concentration in the water is high relative to
the equilibrium concentration between the air and water. The tendency to achieve equilibrium is sufficient to cause diffusion of the aqueous-phase contaminant molecules from the
bulk solution at some concentration, Cb (µg/L), to the air-water interface, where the aqueous phase concentration is Cs (µg/L). Because Cb is larger than Cs, the difference between
6.11
GAS–LIQUID PROCESSES: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS
Bulk Air Phase
Air Film
Water Film
Bulk Water Phase
ys*
ys
Cb
yb
Cs
Cs*
Air-Water
Interface
(a) Striping
Bulk Air Phase
Air Film
Water Film
Bulk Water Phase
Cs*
Cs
yb
Cb
ys
ys*
Air-Water
Interface
(b) Absorption
Figure 6-3 Diagram describing the equilibrium partitioning of a contaminant between the air and
water phases using two film theory.
6.12
CHAPTER Six
them provides the aqueous-phase driving force for stripping. Similarly, the contaminant
concentration in the air at the air-water interface, ys, is larger than the contaminant concentration in the bulk air, yb, and diffusion causes the molecules to migrate from the air-water
interface to the bulk air. The difference between ys and yb is the driving force for stripping
in the gas phase.
Mass Flux. Local equilibrium occurs at the air-water interface because on a local scale
of tens of Angstroms random molecular movement causes the contaminant to dissolve in
the aqueous phase and volatilize into the air. (On a larger scale, these motions equalize the
displacement of the system from equilibrium and cause diffusion.) Accordingly, Henry’s
law can be used to relate ys to Cs (Lewis and Whitman, 1924).
ys = HCs
(6-12)
Fick’s law can be simplified to a linear driving force approximation whereby the flux
(the mass transferred per unit of time per unit of interfacial area) across the air-water interface is proportional to the concentration gradient. Mathematically, the flux of A across the
air-water interface, J A, is given by:
J A = kl (Cb − Cs ) = kg ( ys − yb )
(6-13)
in which kl is the liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient that describes the rate at which
contaminant A is transferred from the bulk aqueous phase to the air-water interface (L/t)
and kg is the gas-phase mass transfer coefficient that describes the rate at which contaminant A is transferred from the air-water interface to the bulk gas phase (m/s). Both kl and kg
are sometimes called local mass transfer coefficients for the liquid and gas phases because
they depend upon the conditions at or near the air-water interface in their particular phase.
Because the interfacial concentrations ys and Cs cannot be measured and are unknown, the
flux cannot be determined from Eq. 6-13. Consequently, it is necessary to define another
flux equation in terms of hypothetical concentrations, which are easy to determine and
describe the displacement of the system from equilibrium. If it is hypothesized that all the
resistance to mass transfer is on the liquid side, then there is no concentration gradient on
the gas side and a hypothetical concentration Cs* can be defined as shown in Fig. 6-3a.
yb = HCs*
(6-14)
in which Cs* is the aqueous-phase concentration of A at the air-water interface assuming
no concentration gradient in the air phase (µg/L), i.e., equilibrium exists between the bulk
gas-phase concentration and the aqueous phase at the interface.
Alternatively, if it is hypothesized that all the resistance to mass transfer is on the gas
side, there is no concentration gradient on the liquid side and a hypothetical concentration
*
ys can be defined as shown in Fig. 6-3a.
*
ys = HCb
(6-15)
*
s
in which y is the equilibrium gas-phase concentration of A at the air-water interface assuming no concentration gradient in the liquid phase (µg/L); it can be calculated from the bulk
liquid-phase concentration.
Mass Flux Based on Water Side. For stripping operations, mass balances are normally
written based on the liquid phase. It is convenient to calculate the mass transfer rate using
the hypothetical concentration, Cs* , and an overall mass transfer coefficient, K L, as shown
in the following equation:
J A = K L (Cb − Cs* )
(6-16)