Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (413.6 KB, 44 trang )
Figure 2.1 A sign such as this placed at each telephone is an
effective way to inform people how to notify authorities.
Plans should be developed which would be operative at differing levels. A basic plan should
be short and easy to understand and to implement. The simple sign in Figure 2.1 above is effective for most emergencies. The caller is expected to be guided by the person (usually a
dispatcher) at the other end of the line for specific guidance for the appropriate response to the
immediate problem. The major caveat is that the time to make such a call may not be available prior
to evacuation for emergencies representing immediate and worsening emergency situations.
Occupants of a facility should be trained to recognize when this condition exists and know how
to initiate an evacuation of as large an area as necessary.
1. Laboratory Emergency Plan
Workers in most laboratories normally are intelligent, knowledgeable individuals and can
cope with many small emergencies such as a spill of a liter of sulfuric acid or a small fire if they
have received appropriate emergency training. Such training is mandatory under the OSHA
laboratory standard. A comprehensive laboratory emergency response plan is required under
current standards for the risks associated with operations within the facility. The plan needs to
include basic information such as risk recognition appropriate to the operations of the facility,
means of internal responses to small to moderate emergencies, and evacuation training. All
employees in the laboratory must receive instruction on these points at the time of beginning
work in the facility, or when any new procedure or operation is introduced posing different risks.
In order to identify potential risks, a detailed, thorough hazard analysis needs to have been done,
based on the things that could go wrong, not just the risks associated with normal operations.
Among information which must be included in the plan is where an employee can get not only
the laboratory specific plan, but also the organization’s overall plan. Another key ingredient of
the plan is where safety and health information for the chemicals used in the laboratory, as
represented by Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs), can be readily provided.
A written emergency plan for an individual laboratory might, in outline, resemble the
following:
I.
In bold letters, the basic number to call in the event of an emergency, perhaps 911or
©2000 CRC Press LLC
II.
III.
possibly an internal number.
A defined line of authority. This should provide the names and home and work
telephone numbers of several individuals authorized to make decisions for the facility.
They should be persons with direct knowledge of laboratory operations and, at least
at the top of the list, persons who can make financial commitments.
A list of external persons/groups, with telephone numbers, who can provide emergency assistance relevant to the risks associated with operations. Such a list should
include at least the following:
Emergency telephone number- 911, if available in the area
University police or corporate security, if not available through the 911 number
Local government police, if not available through 911 number
Fire department number, if not available through 911 number
Emergency medical care (rescue squad), if not available through 911 number
Nearest Poison Control Center
Nearest hospital
Safety department
Spill control group, if not available through 911 dispatcher or Safety Department
Maintenance department number(s)
Laboratory supervisor business and home telephone number
Secondary laboratory authorities business and home telephone numbers
Departmental or building authority number
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
IX.
A list of normally required safety procedures appropriate to laboratory operations.
A simplified list of emergency actions to take for most likely emergencies.
Evacuation instructions, including a map of at least two alternative evacuation routes.
The primary route should be identified and normally should be the shortest, most direct
means of egress from the facility. A gathering area should be identified to which
evacuees would normally go. This is important to allow a “head count” to ensure that
everyone did successfully evacuate, and to provide a location where external agencies
could come in order to receive information concerning the emergency.
Location of Material Safety Data Sheets and other safety and health reference
materials.
Location of the organization’s emergency plan.
Procedures for expanding the emergency response to additional areas of the building
and organization when the emergency is a “large” one extending beyond the
immediate area. The location of one or more telephones outside of the affected
facility but readily accessible should be clearly identified.
Two items need to be placed on or adjacent to the laboratory door to assist emergency
responders when lab personnel are not immediately available during an incident: the line of
authority, listed in Item II above, and indications of the types of hazards to be found within the
laboratory. Some areas have ordinances requiring the use of the National Fire Prevention
Association (NFPA) Diamond for the latter purpose, but unfortunately, most laboratories would
have at least some material with high-risk ratings in all categories. Pictographic labels identifying
classes of hazards within a facility are also used. The best way to alert firefighters would be to
have laboratory inventories on a computer database and provision made for emergency response
groups to have electronic access to this information. Software is available, although not yet in
wide use, which does this.
This plan incorporates some aspects of the Laboratory Industrial Hygiene Plan as required
under OSHA, which could be deleted, since the written industrial hygiene plan must be
maintained. However, items I, II, III, V, VI, and VII are essential.
The plan just described should be reviewed with each new employee and at least annually
for all occupants of a laboratory. An annual practice drill is strongly recommended.
©2000 CRC Press LLC
2.
Organizational Emergency Plan
There is some overlap between planning for responses to local emergencies in individual
laboratories and the response to large-scale emergencies. A t the extremes, the distinction is clear.
A minor spill or a trash can fire obviously is a minor emergency while a fire that involves an entire
building or a major spill where hazardous materials are released into the environment clearly is
beyond the capacity of laboratory personnel. Planning needs to provide guidelines to cover the
transition between the two levels to ensure that an appropriate response does occur. A
comprehensive plan is intended to provide a general infrastructure for al l c l a s s e s o f
emergencies. Detailed plans are essential for organized emergency groups, but for the u s e of
the general public a basic emergency plan is to evacuate the area or building, and call for
emergency help. Often, evacuation will be more than is actually needed, but it is usually a
conservative and safe approach. The essential information to enable this can be placed on a
single page for a facility. Normally, planning for large-scale emergencies will be the
responsibility of the corporate or institutional Emergency Committee, working with internal
groups and the Local Emergency Planning Committee (required under SARA Title III) and
nearby support agencies.
A basic means of reacting to virtually any emergency for untrained persons would be to
place a sign, such as is shown in Figure 2.1, on or near every telephone. In this case, it is up
to the individual at the other end of the telephone line, normally a dispatcher, to give verbal
directions for subsequent actions. The dispatcher needs to be well trained and provided with
a list of individuals and groups whom they would notify of the incident, in an appropriate
priority. These individuals, groups, and priorities are defined in the master emergency plan for
the organization.
Following is a simplified table of contents for an emergency plan established for an area
containing a university, major commercial activities including chemically related industries,
transportation sources (highway, rail, and air), and the usual variety of emergency support
groups.
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
Charge
Assignment of legal authority and responsibilities
Charge
Members of governing body
Purpose of plan, functional description
Instruction on how to use the plan
Initial conditions
Demographics
Geographic description
Natural risks
Climate
Time factors
Local hazard sources
Utilities
Local administrative units
Local emergency units
Local resources
Communications
Notification procedures
List of agencies/personnel requiring notification
Telephone lists
Key personnel and alternates
Telephone tree
Emergency assistance numbers
Local
Regional
State
©2000 CRC Press LLC
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
National
Commercial
Regulatory agencies
Alternative communication options
Authorized radio coordination procedure
Incident recognition/response
Identification of incident
Response protocol
Emergency command structure (see Figure 2.2)
Command center, normal
At-scene control center
Emergency coordinator
On-scene commanders
Responsibilities of emergency support groups (initial response)
Fire/rescue/haz-mat teams
Law enforcement
Medical
Communications (public notification/media relations)
Logistics support
Transportation
Public works
Emergency housing/refuge centers
Administrators (government/corporate/institutional)
Agencies (regional/national/regulatory)
Emergency committee
Ongoing and completion
Assessment of conditions
Containment
Termination
Recovery
Critique
Continuing processes
Training
Practice drills
Resource development
Plan review
Appendices
Incident forms
Mutual aid agreements
Current emergency rosters
Evacuation centers
Hospitals/medical assistance
Social agencies
Emergency equipment lists
Likely incident locations
Cleanup contractors
Experts
Testing laboratories
Maps/overlays
Radio/TV/newspaper contacts
Copies of regulations
All of the groups likely to be involved in the emergency response should possess a copy
and be familiar with the organization’s emergency response manual. The manual should spell
out in detail, but still as simply and as flexibly as possible, the correct response to the classes
©2000 CRC Press LLC
of emergencies incorporated in the ERR.
It is always the intent of every organization that no emergency will ever occur and for the
more unusual situations considered in the ERR, long intervals may pass between incidents.
However, it is essential to include provision for periodic review and practice drills in every
emergency plan.
Figure 2.2 A typical military-type command structure for responding to a substantial emergency.
a. Emergency Plan Components
A partial list of some of the more common laboratory-related emergency situations was
given in Section 2.1. A written response plan should be provided for each of these situations,
identifying the likely locations where these classes of problems would be apt to occur, the
characteristics of the locations, accessibility, probable means of response, local resources
available, contact persons, outside agencies that would need to be notified, and possible
refuge areas to which the occupants would evacuate. Important characteristics or questions
which need to be addressed would include: is it a multiple story building, what type of
construction (combustible or fire resistant), does an alarm and/or sprinkler system exist, are
there standpipe connections or hydrants nearby, what is the typical occupancy level at
various times of day, are there disabled persons in the building requiring special assistance,
are there hazardous materials in the facility, the kinds and quantities of these materials and what is the
potential impact on adjacent structures or areas should hazardous materials be released for
various environmental conditions, among other factors. This type of information requires a
great deal of time to compile. The compiled information should be placed in a well-organized
appendix to the main body of the plan, so that it would not be necessary to wade through
what would necessarily be a massive amount of data for larger organizations.
The management structure is critical to controlling emergencies. This needs to be defined
in advance. If the organization is sufficiently large, the plan may include managing virtually
every aspect internally without utilizing external agencies, unless the scope of the emergency
extends beyond the area of the organization’s control. In such cases, outside agencies must
©2000 CRC Press LLC
be notified, and they may assume partia l responsibility for management of the emergency
response, but an emergency extending beyond the controlled boundaries will definitely
mandate notification of outside agencies. A large organization may have its own fire brigade,
police force, safety department, hazardous material response team, rescue squad, and access
to experts internally. Most larger corporations and universities have some of these, but
typically not all. Smaller firms and colleges might have only a combined security force and a
small safety department.
M o s t emergency plans employ a pseudo-military organization, at least for coordinating
the initial response. An individual, with alternates, is identified as the emergency coordinator.
If the organization is highly structured, a command center, again with alternates, is identified
to which the emergency coordinator and other key individuals will go when an emergency of
sufficient scope occurs. This command center should have radio and telephone communication capability, which would be less vulnerable to loss of power and normal communication
channels. Radio contact on emergency frequencies should be available to fire and rescue
units, nearby hospitals, local and state police, and state emergency response agencies. In
large-scale emergencies, even these channels can become overloaded, as will normal
telephone lines. Cellular telephone service is an alternative which has become widely
available that does not depend upon hard-wired telephone communications. Other
advantages of using cellular telephones are that they do not use what may be limited radio
channels and are less likely to be overheard by the general public. A chart is shown in Figure
2.2 which reflects this typical command center operation.
The emergency coordinator is a key individual and must be someone who will be accepted
as a command figure. The individual ideally should be one to grasp information quickly, be
able to integrate it, and come up with appropriate responses. It is critical too that this person
be sufficiently flexible mentally that proffered advice is not disregarded out of hand. Since the
most often employed emergency response structure is semi-military in nature, a person often
designated as the emergency coordinator will be the public safety director. In the context of
laboratory emergencies, most public safety managers are likely to have had police training,
not scientific training, so having knowledgeable persons present to make technically correct
recommendations is very important. These may be from the safety department and/or
individuals from the scene of the incident. In addition to the structured internal departments,
major resources available at any research-oriented institution are the scientists and
technicians who work there. The ones most likely to be helpful for the types of emergencies
anticipated in developing the emergency plan should be identified and a master list of their
office and home telephone numbers maintained. A copy of the current list should be
maintained by the key internal organizations involved in the emergency response plan. A
copy of the list should also be personally maintained by the key individuals in these latter
organizations, both in their offices and at home. Alternates should always be designated for
these key persons, so that backups are available at all times. Radios, cellular telephones, or
beeper systems to allow these key persons to be reached when not at their usual locations
would be highly desirable.
Organizations having the capability for a response at this level will have some type of
security or police force. These individuals are very likely to be the very first “outsiders”
arriving on the scene of an emergency and, as such, initiating a first response. Clearly, they
need to receive sufficient training to permit them to make an appropriate “first response”
evaluation of the incident and set the containment and response mechanisms in process. It is
relatively rare, though, that they will have sufficient training to manage the response to
technically involved emergencies. Some key personnel among the security or police groups
will ideally have been given special “hazardous-materials-incident” training to allow them to
initiate or effect an evacuation of affected personnel and provide s afety for themselves and
for the evacuees, pending further response actions.
In many jurisdictions, the legal responsibility for management of incidents involving
hazardous materials has been delegated to the fire department or to specialized hazardous
material response teams. When these arrive on the scene, the management responsibility for
an incident may shift so that the emergency coordinator, having the ultimate authority, will no
©2000 CRC Press LLC
longer be a representative of the organization or institution. In such a case, the internal side
of the picture would shift to a supportive and/or advisory role. However, in many instances,
the fire department, if that is the responsible agency to which authority is delegated, may
choose to take substantial advice and guidance from the organization’s team or even ask
them to continue de facto management of the response to the incident. Depending upon the
nature of the incident, one or more regulatory agencies may need to be notified promptly. If a
significant chemical release is involved which becomes airborne or involves a liquid spill such
that hazardous materials escape from the controlled boundaries of a facility, the National
Response Center must be notified as well as the local emergency response coordinator (often
the sheriff, police chief, or civil disaster coordinator) and state agencies. Other agencies
would also be called, as their areas of regulatory concern would become involved. Although
these outside regulatory agencies (note the distinction here between regulatory agencies and
emergency response agencies) will arrive on the scene, the responsibility for the incident
normally remains a local responsibility, unless it truly becomes a massive problem. Written aid
agreements need to have been worked out in detail between corporations a n d i n s t i t u t i o n s
with local emergency response organizations.
There are three groups identified in Figure 2.2 that have not been touched upon as yet.
No major incident occurs without news media quickly arriving at the scene. Emergency
response personnel must not be distracted by these persons, so media contact persons or
groups should be established with whom the news representatives may interact. The security
or police may need to act to ensure that not only news media but other nonessential persons
do not enter the area. In a mature response stage of an emergency, the role of the police will
almost certainly have devolved from active management to control of the boundaries of the
affected area. The emergency coordinator has to have some resources immediately at his
disposal but is unlikely to have access to larger amounts. Typically, when or if these are
needed, authorization will have to come from senior admin istrators with authority to make
substantial financial commitments. Finally, communications has been touched upon in terms
of contacting agencie s, support groups, and the media. The communications team is also
responsible to see that all occupants of an area affected by, for example, an airborne plume of
a toxic gas, are notified. Time may be critical, so the communications group must have
procedures in place to communicate by all reasonable means using radio, TV, roving vehicles
equipped with public address systems, and (if time and conditions permit) door to door
searches.
A library of reference materials should be maintain ed for the use of the emergency responders. Following is a short summary of some of the more useful references, many of which
are revised frequently . Although these are primarily printed books, today a number of other
types of data information sources are becoming widely available for chemical pr o d u c t s ,
primarily as a result of information needs evoked by the OSHA Hazard Communication
Standard. An example of these, included in the list, are Material Safety Data Sheets, available
directly from the chemical product manufacturer and on the Internet. These are provided when
the chemical is first purchased and when significant new information becomes available.
Compilations of these are sold as hard bound or looseleaf volu mes, on microfiche, or on
computer CD-rom disks. The latter contain vast volumes of information on a 4.75 inch plastic
disk. Many of these provide quarterly upgrades at reasonable costs. Most government
regulatory standards and guides are now directly available on the Internet. There is little
reason not to be adequately informed with all of these resources readily available. Many of
the information sources listed below are available either directly on the Internet or available
through Internet orders. In addition, many of the Internet sites include links to other sites,
other than those given below, which provide additional information.
! ACGIH, American Conference of Industrial Hygienists—Threshold Limit Values
(TLV) for Chemical and Physical Substances
1330 Kemper Meadow Drive, Ste. 1600
Cincinnati, OH 45240
http://www.acgih.org/
! Chemical Hazards Response Information condensed Guide(CHRIS)
©2000 CRC Press LLC
Available through Federal General Services Administration. See
http://www.uscg.mil/hq/g-s/g-si/g-sii/
! Department of Transportation Emergency Response Guidebook, DOT Publication
NAERG9G (or later version, revised every 3 years)
http://hazmat.dot.gov/gydebook.htm
also check
http://hazmat.dot.gov/ohmforms.htm
! Safe Handling of Compressed Gases in the Laboratory and Plant
Matheson Gas Products
PO. Box 85
East Rutherford, NJ 07073
http://www.mathesongas.com/catalog1.htm
also,
http://www.mathesongas/acorepro.htm
The company also provides MSDS for all their products via the Internet
! List of Certified Poison Control Centers/by state-region
http://www.medicinenet.com/Art.asp?li=MNI&ag=Y&ArticleKey=869
! Farm Chemicals Handbook
Meister Publishing Co.
37733 Euclid Avenue
Willoughby, OH 44094-5992
http://www.meisterpro.cm/
! Fire Prevention Guide on Hazardous Materials
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
1-Batterymarch Park
P.O. Box 9101
Quincy, MA 02269-9101
http://www.nfpa.org/
! First Aid Manual for Chemical Accidents, 2 nd Edition
Lefevre, Marc J.(Editor), Conibear, Shirley (Contributor)
John Wiley & Sons
605 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10158-0012
! Hazardous Materials
Department of Transportation
Office of Secretary Transportation
Washington, DC 20590
http://hazmat.dot.gov/toc.htm
! Material Safety Data Sheets Master File for Chemicals in Use at the Institution.
(Available from chemical manufacturer or generic database, often directly on the
Internet from the manufacturer. Note that there are now a number of commercial
providers of generic databases, either in hard copy form or in various computer
formats.) For a free MSDS data base via the Internet, see the following, available from
Paul Restivo of the University of Kentucky.
! MSDS Data base available from http://www.ilpi.com/msds/index.chtml
! Merck Index
Merck & Co. Inc.
Rahway, NJ 07065
! NIOSH/OSHA Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 782 10
U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, DC 20402
! Physicians’ Desk Reference
Medical Economics Company
Oradell, NJ 07649
! Prudent Practices for Handling Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories
©2000 CRC Press LLC
National Academy Press
2101 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20418
! Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
CRC Press, LLC
2000 Corporate Blvd., NW
Boca Raton, FL 33431
! Laboratory Safety Principles and Practice
American Society for Microbiology
1913 I St., N.W
Washington, DC 20006
! National Health Council,
1730 M Street, NW, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20036-4505
202-785-3910
Internal resources will not always be sufficient to handle an emergency. Therefore, a list
of external emergency organizations should be maintained by the organizational emergency
groups as well. The following are among those likely to be useful and readily available. Any
others that might be useful to you and are available should be identified and added to the
list. Currently available telephone numbers are given in some cases. These are subject to
change and should be verified before incorporating them in a plan.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Regional emergency group/coordinator
Arson and/or bomb squad, if not otherwise identified
Civil Defense coordinator, if not otherwise identified
Commercial analytical laboratories
Commercial environmental emergency response firms
Law enforcement organizations, e.g., city or county Police Chief or Sheriff, state
police, F.B.I.
Centers for Disease Control, phone no. 404-639-1024 or http://www.cdc.gov/
CHEMTREC (for chemical and pesticide spills), phone no. 800-424-9300 or
http://www.cma.com/
Compressed Gas Association, phone no. 212-412-9000 or
http://www.naturalgas.org/CGA/index.htm
National Fire Prevention Association, phone no. 617-770-3000 or
http://www.nfpa.org/home.html
National Response Center (USCG and EPA), phone no. 800-424-8802, or
http://www.epa.gov:12001/s97is.vts
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, phone no. 301-492-7000 (also state or regional
federal office) or http://nrc.gov/
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, phone no. 202-245-3045 (also state or
regional federal office) also see http://www.osha.gov
Poison Control Center, phone no. 502-362-2327 also see list of certified poison control
centers listed above.
Many of these are sources of information only, and normally do not provide actual assistance for the emergency response. The ones likely to have the capability to do so are the first
six. However, the commercial groups listed represent profit-making organizations and the
institution or corporation must be willing to pay for their services. Since ultimately the
organization (or their insurers) will bear the bulk of the costs for the emergency response,
authority must be provided to pay for these services.
b. Emergency Equipment
Another important step in preparing for an emergency is acquiring appropriate equipment,
which is kept readily available for use. Some of this should be located in the laboratory area
and every laboratory should be furnished with it. Other equipment, because of the cost and
©2000 CRC Press LLC
relatively rare occasions when it is likely to be needed, should be maintained at a central
location. Even the equipment kept centrally needs to be realistically selected. For example, it is
neither necessary nor desirable for every organization to maintain an expensive, fully equipped
hazardous material emergency response team. Some very large organizations may find them
essential but most institutions will not be able to justify the cost.
Some of the emergency equipment needs to be built in, as part of the fixed equipment in the
laboratory. Included in this group are the following items:
Eyewash stations—At least one of these, meeting ANSI standard Z358.1-1990, (or
preferably the new version- Z358.1-1998) must be placed in an easily accessible location. The
travel distance to a unit should be no more than 100 feet according to the standard and travel
time should not exceed 10 seconds. According to Andrew Munster, M.D., Secretary of the
American Burn Association, “time is critical” and Russell Kilmer of the Polymer Products
Division Of the E.I. DuPont Experiment Station in Wilmington, DE, is quoted as saying “Every
laboratory in their facility is equipped with an emergency shower or eyewash station to meet
their safety requirements....” It is very undesirable for an injured person, possibly blinded by a
chemical, to have to find a way to units outside the immediate room, perhaps through a closed
door. Proposed standards for disabled individuals have been proposed as ANSI standard
117.1-1992, establishing access clearances and other physical limits. Eyewash stations should
be mounted on a plumbed water line, rather than the small squeeze bottles that are sometimes
used for the purpose. The squeeze bottles do not contain enough water to be effective. OSHA
inspectors are likely to cite a facility in which the bottles represent the only source of water for
flushing contaminants from a person’s eyes. Where plumbed water lines do not exist, such as
in the field, larger self-contained units are available which do provide sufficient water flow for
an extended period. Cold water itself can be uncomfortable to the eye, so if possible the
eyewash water supply should have a holding tank to ensure that the water is at least near room
temperature. In many of the colder areas of the country, tap water may be well below room
temperature for several months of the year.
Deluge shower — Eyewash stations and deluge showers ideally should be installed as a
unit. The standards cited in the preceding paragraph apply to emergency showers as well.
Although the eyes are probably the most critical exposed organs susceptible to damage,
chemicals spla shed on the face may also splash on the body. A deluge shower should be
capable of delivering about a gallon per second with a water pressure of 20 to 50 psi. A
common error is to plumb the unit into too small a line incapable of delivering an adequate
flow. The water supply should be at least a 1-inch line. Although a floor drain is desirable, it is
not essential. One can always mop up afterward. There should be a timed cutoff, however, at
about 15 to 20 minutes, after which the unit would need to be reactivated. Cases have occurred
where, as an act of vandalism, a deluge shower was activated and rigged so that it would
continue to run. In one case, before the problem was discovered, over 30,000 gallons of water
flooded the facility. The unit was in the hall outside the laboratory; another argument for
placing the units within a lockable room. Care must be taken to ensure that the water from the
shower cannot come into contact with electrical wiring, either directly from the shower or by
coming into contact with extension cords improperly running across the floor. Again, the
units should always be placed in an easily accessible location. Care is essential to maintain
clear accessibility. In laboratories, many instances have been noted where limited floor space
has resulted in equipment being placed immediately under the showers. The ANSI standards
meeting ADA requirements for the disabled cited in the previous section must be maintained.
Fire extinguishers — OSHA requires that every flammable material storage area be
equipped with a portable class B fire extinguisher. The standard does not specify the amount
of a flammable material which makes a room a storage facility so in effect most laboratories
face the need to comply with the standard. The unit should be at least a 12-lb unit and it
should not be necessary to travel more than 25 feet to reach it from any point in the laboratory. This specific requirement in the General Industry Standard may be preempted by the
OSHA Laboratory Standard, but requirements of that standard provide for emergency
response training, which is construed to include training in how to use portable fire
extinguishers. If it is intended that employees may attempt to put out small fires a n d n o t
©2000 CRC Press LLC
simply evacuate immediately, then the employees should be trained in the proper use of an
extinguisher at the time of employment and receive refresher training annually. Class B
extinguishers are, of course, intended for flammable solvents. Other classes of fire extinguishers are class A, intended for combustible solid materials, such as paper or wood, class C,
where electrically live equipment is involved, and class D, where reactive metals, such as
sodium, are used. Combination units such as AB or ABC are available, which, although not
equally effective for all types of fires, can be used where mixed fuels are involved. More
information on fire extinguishers will be found in a later section.
Fire blanket — A fire blanket is a desirable unit to have permanently mounted in a laboratory. The blankets are usually installed in a vertical orientation so that a user need only
grasp the handle and roll themselves up in it in order to smother the fire. Some blan k e t s
include asbestos in their manufacture; these should not be installed, and existing units
should be replaced. The concern is that they could become a source of airborne asbestos
fibers, which have known carcinogenic properties. Unfortunately the heavy woolen blankets
most often used as alternatives are likely to be stolen. There are fire blankets using fiberglass
or special fire-resistant synthetics instead of asbestos or wool available. If a fire situation is a
distinct possibility, consideration should be given to providing a woolen blanke t saturated
with a water-soluble, oil-based gel. This not only protects against fires and aids in escape
through an active fire, but can be useful in the emergency treatment of burn victims. These
gel blankets have a limited shelf life, are expensive, and are infrequently found in a facility.
Emergency lights — Emergency lighting to enable safe evacuation must be provided by
some mechanism. One alternative is to have two sources of commercial power to the lighting
circuits in a building. This can be achieved by having a second source external to the building
or secondary power sources within the building, but this alternative is defeated in power
outages covering a wide area. There are several alternative types of internal power sources
including emergency generators; large, uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) to provide
power for lights for a substantial area which depends on batteries to provide power for a fairly
limited interval; and individual trickle-charged battery -powered lights in individual laboratories. Generator units require frequent testing under load and thus are a maintenance
problem. Uninterruptible power supplies are best suited for maintenance of power to
equipment such as computers, where a controlled shutdown is almost essential. The most
economical alternative especially in retrofitting an older facility is the individual tricklecharged battery-powered units that come on when the power fails.
First aid kit — One of these needs to be in every laboratory and should be kept in a predetermined fixed location. They are intended to be used for minor injuries or basic treatment
while awaiting more advanced care for major injuries. Access to appropriate emergency
medical care is required under OSHA standard 1910.151. Kits should be relatively small units.
Packaged units are sold that are adequate for five or six persons. There is little value in having
larger units, since in the event of an emergency involving more persons, help definitely will be
needed from trained emergency care provider units, including rescue squads and physicians.
Present in the kits should be a variety of bandages, adhesive tapes, alcohol swabs, gauze,
perhaps some protective creams, and a few cold packs. Spe cial situations could require
special items to be available to provide treatment. Items such as iodine, methiolate, and
tourniquets are no longer recommended for inclusion in most cases. It is essential that a
maintenance program be established to ensure that the kit is always adequately supplied. It is
all too easy to use up the supplies without replenishing them.
Fire alarm pull station —The location of the nearest pull station should be familiar to
everyone in the laboratory
Special safety equipment —There are many specialized research areas which require
special safety items such as explosion-proof wiring, combustible gas monitors, and explosion
venting for laboratories working with highly explosive gases. The possibilities are too many
to dwell on at this point.
Some emergency equipment need not be built in but should be available. Among these
items are the following:
Absorptive material — Probably the most common laboratory accident is a spill from a
beaker or a chemical container. The volume is typically fairly small, rarely exceeding more than
4 or 5 liters and usually much less. Of course, there are spills which would require immediate
©2000 CRC Press LLC