Bạn đang xem bản rút gọn của tài liệu. Xem và tải ngay bản đầy đủ của tài liệu tại đây (24.38 MB, 737 trang )
32
Chemical Processing of Ceramics, Second Edition
MOn/2
M(OH)n
Solvothermal
dehydration
Solvothermal
oxidation
Laine
method
MXn
M (metal)
Solvothermal
reduction
M(OR)n
H2O (hydrolysis)
Alkoxide method
(Sol-gel method)
Precipitation
method
(Hydrolysis)
CVD method
Amorphous
M(OH)n
H2O
Forced hydrolysis
Solvothermal
crystallization
Nonhydrolytic
Sol-gel method
Amorphous
MOn/2
Solvothermal
decomposition
of alkoxide
Crystalline
MOn/2
Solvothermal method
Calcination
Methods closely connected with
solvothermal method
Other method
FIGURE 2.1 Solvothermal routes to synthesize crystalline particles of metal oxide.
1. Solvothermal Dehydration of Aluminum Hydroxide
in Alcohols
Solvothermal reaction of gibbsite in ethanol gives boehmite (AlOOH; a polymorph of aluminum oxyhydroxide), which is also obtained by hydrothermal
reaction of the same starting material. The product is comprised of randomly
oriented, thin, small crystals of boehmite. This result suggests that a dissolutionrecrystallization mechanism takes place during the conversion.
The reaction of gibbsite in methanol occurs by a different route. The product
is AlO(OCH3) and has a boehmite-like structure. Since the product has an essentially identical morphology to that of the starting material, Kubo and Uchida73
concluded that the reaction takes place by means of a solid state reaction in which
methanol diffuses into the gibbsite structure with the aid of the Hedvall effect.74
Since the molecular sizes of ethanol and higher alcohols are larger than that of
methanol, the former solvents cannot diffuse into the gibbsite structure.
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Solvothermal Synthesis
33
With an increase in the carbon number of the alcohol, the yield of boehmite
decreases and the yield of χ-alumina increases.72 The latter compound is the
thermal dehydration product of gibbsite,75 and the highest yield of χ-alumina is
observed in pentanol. The morphology of the product obtained in pentanol is
identical to that of the starting material. This feature (pseudomorphism) is typical
for thermal dehydration of metal hydroxides and suggests that a solid state
transformation mechanism takes place. 76 Since higher alcohols have progressively
lower dielectric constants, the dissolution rate of the starting material in higher
alcohols decreases and thermal dehydration of gibbsite becomes significant in
these solvents. Therefore higher alcohols have essentially no effect on product
formation. However, the solvent decreases the fugacity of water and prevents the
hydrothermal conversion of gibbsite, as discussed later.
The reaction in higher alcohols is greatly affected by the particle size of the
starting materials (Table 2.1).72 When coarse gibbsite is used, the yield of boehmite increases. If boehmite were to be formed by the dissolution-recrystallization
mechanism, the yield of boehmite would decrease with an increase in the particle
size of the starting material; this is not the case. Formation of boehmite can be
explained by the intraparticle hydrothermal reaction mechanism, originally proposed by de Boer et al.77,78 for the formation of boehmite by thermal dehydration
of gibbsite. It is well known that when coarse gibbsite is thermally dehydrated,
boehmite is formed, and that formation of boehmite stops when formation of χalumina starts. According to the mechanism, thermal dehydration starts at the
“hot spot” of the particle and water molecules formed by dehydration cannot
diffuse out from the particles. Therefore a hydrothermal condition is achieved
inside the particle and boehmite is formed. When thermal dehydration yielding
χ-alumina starts, pore systems are formed inside the originating particle and water
that facilitates the hydrothermal conversion into boehmite diffuses out from the
particles; therefore formation of boehmite ceases. Formation of boehmite from
coarse gibbsite under the solvothermal conditions in higher alcohols can be
explained similarly.
Further increases in the carbon number of alcohol result in an increase in the
yield of boehmite.72 Since the reaction was carried out in a closed system, the
water formed by the dehydration of gibbsite is adsorbed on the surface of the
starting material, where water facilitates the hydrothermal conversion of gibbsite
into boehmite. Actually, when the same starting material is heated in a closed
vessel in the absence of any solvent, complete conversion into boehmite is
observed. This result shows that the alcoholic solvent somehow retards the hydrothermal conversion of gibbsite. Solvent molecules (higher alcohols) lower the
fugacity (activity) of water by forming strong hydrogen bonds between alcohol
and water molecules. This effect becomes less significant with an increase in the
carbon number of alcohol, and therefore the yield of boehmite increases with an
increase in the carbon number of alcohol. The reaction mechanisms for the
alcohothermal dehydration of gibbsite are summarized in Table 2.1.79
The reaction in an open system gives a completely different result. Since the
boiling point of water is much lower than that of higher alcohols, water formed
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
34
Chemical Processing of Ceramics, Second Edition
TABLE 2.1
Solvothermal Reaction of Gibbsite in Alcohols and Mineral Oil at 250°C
for 2 h
Yield (%) of the Product from
Gibbsite with a Particle Size of
Solvent
Product
80 µm
8 µm
Mechanism for the
Formation of the
Product
Water
Ethanol
Propanol
Boehmite
Boehmite
Boehmite
χ-alumina
Boehmite
χ-Alumina
Boehmite
χ-Alumina
Boehmite
χ-Alumina
Boehmite
χ-Alumina
Boehmite
100
100
99
0
98
0
51
16
51
0
86
3
100
100
100
70
24
56
38
21
41
27
30
41
53
100
DP(sol)a
DP(sol)
DP(sol), (IPH)b
Solid state reaction
DP(sol), IPH
Solid state reaction
IPH
Solid state reaction
IPH, HYDc
Solid state reaction
HYD, IPH
Solid state reaction
HYD
Butanol
Pentanol
Hexanol
Octanol
Mineral oil
a
Dissolution-precipitation mechanisms: dissolution of aluminum species in the solvent used for the
solvothermal reaction.
b Intraparticle hydrothermal reaction originally proposed by de Boer et al. 77,78 for the formation of
boehmite during thermal dehydration of coarse gibbsite.
c Hydrothermal reaction takes place because of the water adsorbed on the particles surface: Therefore
crystallization of the product occurs by means of the dissolution-precipitation mechanism.
by partial thermal dehydration of gibbsite will escape from the reaction system,
and therefore simple thermal dehydration will occur.72
2. Alcohothermal Dehydration of Hydroxides of Metals
Other Than Aluminum
Although the solvothermal dehydration of metal hydroxides depends on the
solubility of the precursor in the reaction medium and the ease of thermal
dehydration of the precursors, the essential features are similar to those for
aluminum hydroxide discussed in the previous section. Yin et al.80 examined the
phase transformation of H2TiO9 · nH2O (prepared from fibrous K2Ti4O9) by solvothermal reaction in methanol and ethanol at 200 to 325°C and compared them
with those by calcination in air or hydrothermal reaction. Under the solvothermal
conditions, it transformed to monoclinic TiO2 and then anatase, while under
hydrothermal conditions or calcination in air it transforms into H2Ti8O17 before
transformation into monoclinic TiO2. All the products retained a fibrous morphology similar to that of K2Ti4O9, which was used as the starting material.
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Solvothermal Synthesis
35
However, the microstructure of the fibers changed significantly; therefore they
concluded that the phase transformation proceeded by a dissolution-reprecipitation mechanism. They also reported that anatase obtained by alcohothermal
reactions had much higher photocatalytic activity than Degussa P25 titania.81,82
3. Solvothermal Dehydration of Aluminum Hydroxide
in Glycols and Related Solvents
When a solvent having an electron-donating group, such as glycol, amino alcohol,
or alkoxyethanol, is used as the solvent for the solvothermal dehydration of
gibbsite, a completely different reaction occurs. The product is the alkyl (glycol)
derivative of boehmite (AlO(OH)x(O(CH2)nX)y; x + y = 1; X = OH, NR2, or OR),
in which solvent molecules are incorporated between the boehmite layers through
the covalent bonds.17,83 The fact that the product has Al–O–C bonds17,83 indicates
that equilibrium occurs between aluminum hydroxide and alkoxide84 and that
alkoxide can be formed from hydroxide at high temperatures:
→
M(OH)n + nROH ← M(OR)n + nH2O
∆H > 0, ∆S > 0. (2.2)
Formation of alkoxide from hydroxide is a reverse reaction of hydrolysis of
alkoxide, which proceeds easily at room temperature and is a highly exothermic
reaction (therefore Equation 2.2 has a positive reaction enthalpy). However, metal
hydroxide is usually solid and has a polymeric M–(OH)–M network, while metal
alkoxide usually has oligomeric structure. Therefore the former compound has
lesser freedom (lower entropy). Consequently the unfavorable enthalpy term is
overcome by the entropy term at high temperatures and equilibrium is attained.
The difference between the reactions in simple alcohols and in glycols can
be attributed to the stabilization effects of the intramolecular electron-donating
group on the intermediate and to the decrease in the activity (fugacity) of water
due to solvation by the highly hydrophilic solvent molecules.
The particle size of the starting material has a significant effect on this
reaction.85 When gibbsite with a particle size less than 0.2 µm is used, complete
conversion into boehmite derivatives is attained, while the use of coarser gibbsite
results in an increase in the yield of well-crystallized boehmite formed by the
intraparticle hydrothermal reaction. An increase in the particle size of gibbsite
also increases recovery of the starting material. Randomly oriented thin plates of
boehmite derivatives are formed on the surface of the pseudomorphs of the
originating gibbsite particles. An important point here is that the product is not
formed in the bulk of the solvent. Two explanations are possible: the gibbsite
surface acts as the nucleation site of the product, or the gradient of the concentration of water, which declines from the surface of the particle to the bulk solvent,
causes precipitation of product particles near the surface of the originating particles. The product particles formed on the originating gibbsite crystals prohibit
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
36
Chemical Processing of Ceramics, Second Edition
dissolution of the starting material and a certain amount of the starting material
remains unconverted even with prolonged reaction times.
4. Glycothermal Synthesis of α-Alumina
When microcrystalline gibbsite (less than 0.2 µm) is allowed to react in higher
glycols such as 1,4-butanediol, 1,5-pentanediol, or 1,6-hexanediol at higher temperatures (approximately 300°C), α-alumina is formed.7 This was the first example of thermodynamically stable metal oxide crystallized in organic solvent at a
temperature lower than that required by the hydrothermal reaction. The α-alumina
is formed from the glycol derivative of boehmite as an intermediate and product
particles are hexagonal plates with a relatively large surface area. This indicates
that the dissolution-recrystallization mechanism occurs.
Hydrothermal synthesis of α-alumina has been well studied. Since the hydrothermal reaction of aluminum compound yields boehmite at relatively low temperatures (approximately 200°C),86 transformation of boehmite was examined
and it was reported that more than 10 hours is required for complete conversion
into α-alumina, even with a reaction at 445°C in a 0.1 N NaOH solution and in
the presence of seed crystals.87 On the other hand, under glycothermal conditions,
α-alumina is formed at 285°C for 4 h. The equilibrium point between diaspore
(another polymorph of AlOOH) and α-alumina under the saturated vapor pressure
of water was determined to be 360°C.88 However, near the equilibrium point, the
transformation rate is very sluggish, and only a small conversion of diaspore is
observed. Therefore complete conversion of diaspore into α-alumina requires a
much higher temperature. Since boehmite is slightly less stable than diaspore,
the hypothetical equilibrium point between boehmite and α-alumina would be
lower than that for diaspore-alumina. However, α-alumina would not be formed
by a hydrothermal reaction at such a low temperature as has been achieved in
the glycothermal reaction.
The difference between two reactions may be attributed to the activity of
water present in the reaction system, since the overall reaction is the dehydration
reaction (Equation 2.1). However, intentional addition of a small amount of water
caused enhancement of α-alumina formation rather than the retardation expected
from the equilibrium point of view.89 Another important factor is the difference
in the thermodynamic stabilities of the intermediates between glycothermal and
hydrothermal reactions; that is, the glycol derivative of boehmite vs. well-crystallized boehmite. The latter compound is fairly stable and therefore conversion
of this compound into α-alumina has only a small driving force. On the other
hand, the glycol derivative of boehmite has Al–O–C bonds and therefore is more
unstable with respect to α-alumina. Thus conversion of this compound into αalumina has a much larger driving force. The smaller crystallite size of the glycol
derivative of boehmite also contributes to the instability of the intermediate.
The reaction is strongly affected by the particle size of the starting material.89
When gibbsite with a particle size less than 0.2 µm is used, complete conversion
into α-alumina is attained. When coarse gibbsite is used for the reaction, the
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Solvothermal Synthesis
37
product is χ-alumina together with well-crystallized boehmite. α-Alumina was
not formed at all.89 As mentioned in the previous section, formation of the
intermediate, the glycol derivative of boehmite, ceases at a certain point in the
reaction because the originating gibbsite particles are covered with the crystals
of the glycol derivative of boehmite. Higher reaction temperatures cause thermal
dehydration of gibbsite into χ-alumina, which seems to facilitate epitaxial decomposition of the glycol derivative of boehmite into a transition alumina. Therefore,
when coarser gibbsite is used as the starting material, α-alumina cannot be
obtained, even at higher temperatures.
There are two other important points in this reaction.89 Water formed as a
byproduct in the formation of the glycol derivative of boehmite facilitates crystallization of α-alumina by increasing the dissolution rate. Intentional addition
of a small amount of water actually lowers the α-alumina crystallization temperature; however, excess water causes the formation of boehmite, which is fairly
stable under the reaction conditions and contaminates the product. Another point
is the presence of α-alumina nuclei in the starting gibbsite sample. The starting
gibbsite is commercially produced by milling coarser gibbsite. It is known that
prolonged grinding or milling of gibbsite particles causes mechanochemical transformation into α-alumina.90 Therefore α-alumina-like domains are formed at this
stage and act as the nuclei of α-alumina in the glycothermal reaction. Bell et al.91
also addressed the importance of seed particles on the size of hexagonal αalumina platelets.
Although the glycol derivative of boehmite is also prepared from aluminum
alkoxides (see Section III.B.9), this product cannot transform into α-alumina
because of the absence of α-alumina nuclei and water. However, the reaction of
a mixture of gibbsite (microcrystalline) and aluminum alkoxide in the presence
of a small amount of water gives α-alumina with larger crystallite sizes than
those obtained from gibbsite alone.
Cho et al.92 reported that α-alumina is formed from aluminum hydroxide
prepared by precipitation with potassium hydroxide. However, when alkaline
hydroxide is used as the precipitation agent, alkali cations are incorporated into
the product, and commercial gibbsite samples are always contaminated with a
small amount of sodium ions. Therefore their starting material seems to be
contaminated with potassium, and the presence of potassium ions in their precursor seems to play an important role in the nucleation of α-alumina. They also
reported that hydroxyl ions, acetic acid, and pyridine added to the glycothermal
reaction system affect the morphology of the α-alumina particles because of their
preferential adsorption to a specific surface.93
B. SOLVOTHERMAL DECOMPOSITION
OF
METAL ALKOXIDES
1. Metal Alkoxide in Inert Organic Solvents
Thermal decomposition of metal alkoxides gives the corresponding metal
oxides. This reaction is usually applied for the synthesis of oxide films or
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
38
Chemical Processing of Ceramics, Second Edition
TABLE 2.2
Phases Formed by Solvothermal Decomposition of Alkoxides
and Acetylacetonates
Starting Material
Reaction
Temperature
Product
Reference
Aluminum isopropoxide
Aluminum n-butoxide
Aluminum tert-butoxide
Zirconium isopropoxide
Zirconium n-propoxide
Zirconium acetylacetonate
Zirconium tert-butoxide
Titanium isopropoxide
Titanium oxyacetylacetonate
Titanium tert-butoxide
Niobium n-butoxide
Tantalum n-butoxide
Iron acetylacetonate
Iron (n-butoxide)
Lanthanum isopropoxide
300
300
300
300
300
300
200
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
χ-Alumina
No reaction
Amorphous
Tetragonal zirconia
No reaction
Tetragonal zirconia
Amorphous
No reaction
Anatase
Anatase
Amorphous
Amorphous
Magnetite
Hematite + magnetite
Lanthanum hydroxide
95
95
95
96
96
96
96
97
97
98
99, 100
101
102
103
103
aerosols by the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method.94 Whereas CVD
reactions of metal alkoxides under reduced pressure usually produce amorphous
products, solvothermal reactions of secondary alkoxides in inert organic solvents such as toluene, in some cases, give crystalline products (Table 2.2). For
example, thermal decomposition of aluminum isopropoxide and zirconium
isopropoxide in toluene at 300°C yields χ-alumina95 and tetragonal zirconia,96
respectively. This means that solvent molecules present in the reaction system
facilitate crystallization of the product.
The primary alkoxides of these metals do not decompose at 300°C, as decomposition of these compounds requires much higher temperatures, whereas tertiary
alkoxides decompose at much lower temperatures, yielding amorphous products.
These results indicate that heterolytic cleavage of the C–O bond yielding carbocation and metaloxo anion (>M–O; Equation 2.3) is the key step, and stability
of the carbocation determines the reactivity of the metal alkoxides:95
M(OR)n → >M–O– + R+
(2.3)
However, this reaction is strongly affected by the metal cation of the alkoxide; thus Nb(OBu)5 decomposes in toluene at 573 K yielding amorphous Nb2O5
powders,100 whereas Ti(O-iPr)4 is not decomposed under the same reaction
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC